Teams

NITA S 75CWf Naperville-Parse/Lamb

2025 NITA3 Summerz Combo · NITA Summer 7.5 Combo Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-14vs NITA S 75CWb Five Star-DelgrossoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Lamb / Toni Mountcastle vs Patricia Nelson / Michelle Dougherty4-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarey Fredrick / Heidi Millman vs Martha Skryd / Cindy Monahan3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesVilia Dedinas / Lisa Ventrella vs Dorothy OMalley / Caroline Noschese3-6, 0-6
2025-08-12vs NITA S 75CWc HF Racquet-YoungLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Millman / Suzette Stapleton vs Patricia Jablonski / Jessica Barnes4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesVilia Dedinas / Christine Rusthoven vs Alja Hessami-Maas / Jennifer Huffaker6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathy Johns / Cherie Vick vs Julie Ladewig / Kathie Melean4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKristin Lamb / Isabella Herda vs Erica White / Melissa Robinson2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Millman / Terri Parse vs Illana Hodges / Margaret Weiss5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCherie Vick / Kathy Johns vs Michelle Parks / Nancy Valerio6-2, 5-6, 1-0
2025-07-22vs NITA S 75CWa Challenge-KeaneLost 12
W#1 DoublesLouise Burnison / Isabella Herda vs Zagorka James / Catherine Wasylenko6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristin Lamb / Toni Mountcastle vs Sheila Naylor / Megan Jones2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Millman / Christine Rusthoven vs Kristine Schreiner / Brianna Keane2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-16vs NITA S 75CWc HF Racquet-YoungLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarey Fredrick / Jennifer Peterson vs Christina Griffith / Monika Nalepa0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKIM DOUGHERTY / Alicia Yaeger vs Cari Anderson / Kathie Melean0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Johns / Cherie Vick vs Kristen Long / Allycn Grcevic3-6, 2-6
2025-07-10vs NITA S 75CWa Challenge-KeaneLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsabella Herda / Kristin Lamb vs Zagorka James / Catherine Wasylenko4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Yaeger / Suzette Stapleton vs Elisabeth Sanders / Kristine Schreiner5-7, 4-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCherie Vick / Lisa Ventrella vs Palmer Langenstrass / Ashley Burk3-6, 2-5
W#1 DoublesLouise Burnison / Isabella Herda vs Kathleen Merkle / Jill Lauesen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPauline Tuchscherer / Carey Fredrick vs Caroline Rosemeyer / Lina Kamenev1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Millman / Suzette Stapleton vs Bobbi Diedrick / Karie Scrogin4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Peterson / Suzette Stapleton vs Julie Sujack / Lina Kamenev3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIsabella Herda / Pauline Tuchscherer vs Annette Hennessy / Hope Geldes4-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesChristine Rusthoven / Vilia Dedinas vs Kathleen Merkle / Carrie Cook4-6, 4-6
2025-06-17vs NITA S 75CWb Five Star-DelgrossoLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Peterson / Suzette Stapleton vs Patricia Nelson / Michelle Dougherty6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesIsabella Herda / Cherie Vick vs Martha Skryd / Lesa Moskowitz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVilia Dedinas / Kathy Johns vs Dorothy OMalley / Tracey Rubach0-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesPauline Tuchscherer / Isabella Herda vs Ayano Nakamura / Christie Jordan0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Lamb / Christine Rusthoven vs Margaret Weiss / Sophia Koliatsis6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerri Parse / Toni Mountcastle vs Yumi Ida / Michelle Yuen1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Summer 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 75CWc HF Racquet-Young73201022212
2NITA S 75CWa Challenge-Keane73181226247
3NITA S 75CWd Oak Park TC-Scrogin/Sujack73171328242
4NITA S 75CWe Wilmette TC-Wright/Nakamura64171328223
5NITA S 75CWb Five Star-Delgrosso37111940300
6NITA S 75CWf Naperville-Parse/Lamb01072352329

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Louise Burnison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Cherie Vick
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.37
KIM DOUGHERTY
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Alicia Yaeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Vilia Dedinas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Isabella Herda
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
Toni Mountcastle
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Suzette Stapleton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Terri Parse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Christine Rusthoven
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Lisa Ventrella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Carey Fredrick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Heidi Millman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kathy Johns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Lamb
published
Pauline Tuchscherer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Lamb + Pauline Tuchscherer11656% games+11.4% vs expected
Pauline Tuchscherer + Isabella Herda3256% games+6.6% vs expected
Louise Burnison + Pauline Tuchscherer6354% games+4.1% vs expected
Christine Rusthoven + KIM DOUGHERTY3345% games−0.8% vs expected
Heidi Millman + Suzette Stapleton3447% gamesnot enough data
Christine Rusthoven + Cherie Vick2540% gamesnot enough data
Suzette Stapleton + Isabella Herda4145% gamesnot enough data
Isabella Herda + Cherie Vick2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Louise Burnison
69W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Cherie Vick
21W–60L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
KIM DOUGHERTY
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
4
Alicia Yaeger
48W–114L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
3.5
Vilia Dedinas
111W–109L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Isabella Herda
66W–63L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Toni Mountcastle
235W–198L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Suzette Stapleton
40W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Terri Parse
114W–162L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Christine Rusthoven
27W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Lisa Ventrella
58W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Carey Fredrick
42W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Heidi Millman
18W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Johns
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Lamb
95W–72L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pauline Tuchscherer
76W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.