← Search

Pauline Tuchscherer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elmhurst, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 103W–72L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history175 matches
L
2025-12-13 · NITA F 75CMXd Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jim Vetrone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
Default
2025-11-23 · NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-Lukas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Hodge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-22 · NITA E 40W18c Oak Brook-Lukas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darci Trout
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · NITA F 75CWc Naperville-Parse/Lamb · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Isabella Herda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-05 · NITA F 75CWc Naperville-Parse/Lamb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Hanlon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-04 · NITA F 75CMXd Courts Plus-Mountcastle · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Atwood Burns mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-14 · NITA E 40W40b Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louise Burnison
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-01 · NITA S 75CWf Naperville-Parse/Lamb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carey Fredrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-29 · NITA S 75CWf Naperville-Parse/Lamb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Isabella Herda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-5
L
2025-06-14 · NITA S 75CWf Naperville-Parse/Lamb · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Isabella Herda
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-15 · NITA W 40W40b Courts Plus-Trout/Peterson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Lamb
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-02-08 · NITA W 75CWb Naperville-Austerberry/Lamb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Hanlon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
33W–11L · 58.8% of games
4.0
37.1%
13W–22L · 46.9% of games
6.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.3% of games
7.5
57.9%
33W–24L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
54.2%
13W–11L · 53.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova