← Search

Hope Geldes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berwyn, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 17W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history38 matches
L
2025-11-15 · NITA F 75CWd Hinsdale-Scrogin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Hennessy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-08 · NITA F 75CWd Hinsdale-Scrogin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendy Leto
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · NITA F 75CWd Hinsdale-Scrogin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Poe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-08-17 · NITA S 75CWd Oak Park TC-Scrogin/Sujack · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Hennessy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-27 · NITA S 75CWd Oak Park TC-Scrogin/Sujack · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bobbi Diedrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-20 · NITA S 35W40f Oak Park TC-Myers/Wienkes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosa Abreu
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-02 · NITA S 75CWDd Oak Park-Myers/Locke · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracy Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-06-29 · NITA S 75CWd Oak Park TC-Scrogin/Sujack · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annette Hennessy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-3
W
2025-06-27 · NITA S 75CWDd Oak Park-Myers/Locke · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Poe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-10 · NITA S 35W40f Oak Park TC-Myers/Wienkes · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-04 · NITA S 75CWDd Oak Park-Myers/Locke · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Poe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-01 · NITA S 35W40f Oak Park TC-Myers/Wienkes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Hoyt
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 53.6% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe