Teams

Rayborn 6.5 2024

2024 Combo Doubles 18&Over-PB · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-06vs Canebrake 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLacey Miller / Tessa Bledsoe vs Blair Viator / Janie Gilmore6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTina Boykin / Robin Hudson vs Mandy Miller / Bekah Baugh1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Evans / Tracy Speights vs Allison Radley / Susan Hamlett3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-02vs LCC 6.5 Combo-SmithWon 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Dozier / Christi Dyess vs Mary Scully / Lauren McBride6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Speights / Amy Evans vs Aly Smith / Jessica Campbell6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Hudson / Hollie Parker vs Kendall Simoneau / Dixie Shoemake7-5, 6-4
2024-09-19vs HCC 6.5 COMBOWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristi Dyess / Ashley Majors vs Heather Reed / Sarah Parker6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTina Boykin / Hollie Parker vs Katherine Callaway / Lauren Gonzales6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Rayborn / Kaitlyn Hennessey vs Vonda Fairey / Lucy Knight2-6, 3-6
2024-09-16vs Fins 6.5 HolcombWon 21
W#1 DoublesTina Boykin / Ashley Majors vs Laura Broussard / Kayla Rainey6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRenee Dozier / Amy Evans vs Barbara Holcomb / Allison Mayers7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeth Rayborn / Lacey Miller vs Brooke Stuart / Beth Rodgers5-7, 4-6
2024-09-04vs Canebrake 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Majors / Tina Boykin vs Kellie Early / Janie Gilmore6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracy Speights / Amy Evans vs Bekah Baugh / Mandy Miller7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLacey Miller / Tessa Bledsoe vs Susan Hamlett / Allison Radley4-6, 1-6
2024-08-28vs HCC 6.5 COMBOWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Majors / Tina Boykin vs Lauren Gonzales / Regan Rhian Parker5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Stringer / Robin Hudson vs Katherine Callaway / Laurie Rimes6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Rayborn / Hollie Parker vs Vonda Fairey / Sarah Parker6-1, 6-1
2024-08-21vs Hinchey 18+ Combo TatumWon 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Dozier / Hollie Parker vs Monica Buck / Bettie Collins6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Rayborn / Tina Boykin vs Julie McMahan / Tena Baine6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLacey Miller / Tessa Bledsoe vs Nema Hinchey / Lisa Stevens6-3, 6-3
2024-08-18vs LCC 6.5 Combo-SmithWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Dozier / Christi Dyess vs Kendall Simoneau / Elizabeth Kent7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTessa Bledsoe / Lacey Miller vs ANGELA TARRANT / Brittany Carter6-1, 6-0
2024-08-12vs Hinchey 18+ Combo TatumSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobin Hudson / Tina Boykin vs Nema Hinchey / Kylee Flores4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Rayborn / Lacey Miller vs Pam Shearer / Tena Baine6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Tina Boykin
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.42
Tracy Speights
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Renee Dozier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Robin Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.02
Christi Dyess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Hollie Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Beth Rayborn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Emily Stringer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kaitlyn Hennessey
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Lacey Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tessa Bledsoe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Rayborn + Robin Hudson2352% games−3.3% vs expected
Lacey Miller + Tessa Bledsoe224 matchesnot enough data
Robin Hudson + Tina Boykin033 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlyn Hennessey + Tina Boykin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Boykin
65W–20L career · 19 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tracy Speights
17W–21L career · 6 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Renee Dozier
11W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.25
Robin Hudson
38W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Christi Dyess
39W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Hollie Parker
53W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%4%96%
2.74
3.5
Beth Rayborn
11W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.73
Emily Stringer
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kaitlyn Hennessey
31W–13L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lacey Miller
5W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tessa Bledsoe
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.