Teams

MIS:3.5 W:Frickman/Coleman

2022 ECT Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.5 Women Flt 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesSarah Steverman / Sky Hoyt vs Valerie Libert / Leslie Gourlay6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDing Ding vs MaryBeth Giles6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLauri Burke / Mia Nolan vs Tina Edwards / Carolyn Katz1-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Emily Hayes vs Beverly Costello / Ruthanne Rothman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Rebecca Coffey6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Sullivan / Sky Hoyt vs Susan Potter / Mary Ann Moran6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMia Nolan / Amy Searle vs Nancy Schumann / Angela Halperin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Sky Hoyt vs Junjira Sookvaree / Laura King6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauri Burke / Mia Nolan vs Lynn Allen / Liesl Purviance6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Searle / Amy Baumann vs Christina Ruenhorst / Kara Horvath0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Searle / Donna Sullivan vs Maureen Goodrich / Kristen Rosecrans4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEleanor Shields / Ann Wright vs Debra Musto / Lynette Roth5-7, 6-7
2022-05-07vs MAD:MadRackets 3.5W:GoldfederWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauri Burke / Andrea Frickman vs Patricia Goldfeder / Jennifer Brant6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Searle vs Juliette Fumex5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDing Ding / Ann Wright vs Alison Wehrle / Diane Hills7-6, 1-3, 1-0
2022-04-30vs LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteoSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Steverman / Emily Hayes vs Debra Chamberlain / Jessica Kirwan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDing Ding vs Anne Luner6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Wright / Mia Nolan vs Kim de Matteo / Lisa Belliveau6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Baumann / Annette David-Rallo vs Connie Hurtt / Michele Hootstein0-6, 1-6
2022-04-10vs NHH:Fireballs II:GershfeldLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Frickman / Donna Sullivan vs Lisa Johnson / Shelley Marcus6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Wright / Lauri Burke vs Carol Evans / Michelle Cuomo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEleanor Shields / Amy Baumann vs Amy Luisi / Dorothy Mancini3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Women Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIS:3.5 W:Frickman/Coleman07161227217
2LS:DeMatteo's Diva's:DeMatteo07161230248
3GF:Namaste at the Net:Tsoukanelis/Rosecrans07141430249
4TC:Ladies of the Court:Wall/Sookvaree07151332254
5NHH:Fireballs II:Gershfeld07151332247
6OSB:Saybrook Slicers:Coffey/Costello07131534262
7MAD:MadRackets 3.5W:Goldfeder07121638266
8OSB:Causing A Racquet II:Giles/Katz07111738291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Andrea Frickman
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
Donna Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Amy Searle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.20
Sarah Steverman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Ding Ding
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Mia Nolan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Amy Baumann
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.79
Lauri Burke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Eleanor Shields
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Annette David-Rallo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sky Hoyt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Nolan + Sarah Steverman4161% games+3.3% vs expected
Amy Baumann + Annette David-Rallo9753% games−1.2% vs expected
Amy Baumann + Eleanor Shields2342% gamesnot enough data
Amy Baumann + Lauri Burke224 matchesnot enough data
Lauri Burke + Mia Nolan123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Sullivan + Annette David-Rallo033 matchesnot enough data
Sky Hoyt + Sarah Steverman303 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Frickman + Sarah Steverman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Frickman
116W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Donna Sullivan
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Searle
85W–115L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Sarah Steverman
30W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ding Ding
27W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Mia Nolan
25W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Amy Baumann
93W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Lauri Burke
85W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Eleanor Shields
24W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Annette David-Rallo
41W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Christine Edwards
6W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sky Hoyt
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.