Teams

OC Dana Hills TC - Devon

2023 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC Women WD 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-07Won 10
W#1 SinglesNina Berry vs Laurette Jennings7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-30vs OC LNRC - Gina 1030Won 10
W#2 DoublesLori McFerren / Nina Berry vs Jill Moro / Courtney Zani6-3, 6-2
2023-06-23vs OC Coto De Caza - UlrikeWon 10
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Lori McFerren vs Ulrike Leivici / Deborah Todd7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKelly Dishno / Nina Berry vs SUSAN BROWN / Hye Jin Robertson6-7, 2-6
2023-05-22vs OC LLW Great Park JoleenLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori McFerren / Nina Berry vs Stephanie Tarzia / Jill Hauk6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-12vs OC - Los Cab - NicoleLost 01
L#1 DoublesNina Berry / Lori McFerren vs Theresa Jeong / Kat Thieu4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-28vs OC Lifetime RSC - KellyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDevon Hogue / Nina Berry vs Christine Parry / Kristen Bondy7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.11
Devon Hogue
published 4
3.87
Lori McFerren
published
3.69
Carrie Anderson
published 4
3.59
Jenny Tetley
published
3.57
Jodi Mitchell
published
3.57
Michelle Haghani
published
3.56
Denise Banks
published 4
3.50
Kelly Dishno
published
3.50
Jeannine Sandling
published
3.47
3.46
Amy Cramer
published 4
3.23
Holly Ferber
published
2.66
Tracy Wiegand
published
Lori Reimers
published
Tracy Brennan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Devon Hogue + Nina Berry9460% gamesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nina Berry
112W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Devon Hogue
73W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
4.11
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Carrie Anderson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Jenny Tetley
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Jodi Mitchell
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
Michelle Haghani
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Denise Banks
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jeannine Sandling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Dara Luangpraseut
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Amy Cramer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Holly Ferber
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Tracy Wiegand
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.66
Lori Reimers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Brennan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.