Teams

Team 6 Deuces Wild

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-20vs Team 8 Spin DoctorsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMimi Vu / Jane Ignacio vs Valerie Camillo / Stephanie Wright5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Hall / Amy Din vs Emily Knowles / Cynthia Grubbs0-6, 1-6
2024-04-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Din / Jennifer Prebyl vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Ignacio / Laleh Sadeghi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-24vs Team 5 Loosely StrungLost 01
L#2 DoublesJane Ignacio / Yvonne Manzo vs Deborah Williams / Judy Rector0-6, 2-6
2024-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesSara Cruley / Margaret Herbold vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-16vs Team 12 FultzLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Prebyl / Jane Ignacio vs Michele Brookhart / Kelly Kennedy2-6, 3-6
2024-02-18vs Team 10 Westwood WolfpackLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Ignacio / Margaret Herbold vs Bradley Vineyard / Katherine Virkstis1-6, 2-6
2024-02-03vs Team 15 VolleyVixensLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Ignacio / Laleh Sadeghi vs Joanna Schindler / Debra Ciesar1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Din / Yvonne Manzo vs Michelle O'Brien / Lyn Reid3-6, 1-6
2024-01-23vs Team 14 Slice GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Hall / Amy Din vs Heidi Dillard / Johanna Maney2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Mimi Vu
published
2.80
Margaret Herbold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Tracye Duffin
published
2.56
Ayako Doi
published 3
2.52
Jane Ignacio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.50
Amy Din
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Elisa Leak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Ignacio + Margaret Herbold1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mimi Vu
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3
Margaret Herbold
26W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Tracye Duffin
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Ayako Doi
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Jane Ignacio
29W–88L career · 10 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Amy Din
45W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%49%51%
2.50
Elisa Leak
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.