Teams

Team 10 Westwood Wolfpack

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 2.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-25vs Team 9 Haven AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaureen Matta / Bradley Vineyard vs Suzanne Pritsios / Jenifer Heilig7-5, 1-4, 1-0
2024-02-25vs Team 16 Capital CrushLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Virkstis / Bradley Vineyard vs Elisa Wolf / Tosha Clark3-6, 3-6
2024-02-18vs Team 6 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesBradley Vineyard / Katherine Virkstis vs Jane Ignacio / Margaret Herbold6-1, 6-2
2024-01-28vs Team 11 Rally Cats NOVAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Diaz / Bradley Vineyard vs Diane Quigley / KERSTIN DEMKO6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Stephanie Paduano
published
3.01
Jacqueline Diaz
published
2.94
Rachel Kim
published
2.89
Angelena Hirzel
published 3
2.87
Bradley Vineyard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Ann Bauer
published 3
2.79
Laureen Matta
published
2.78
Jacquelyn McVey
published
2.75
Cari McBride
published 3
2.68
Katherine Virkstis
published
2.67
Mary Leigh Morrison
published
2.67
Susannah Porteous
published
2.65
Barbara Timblin
published 3
2.52
Erin Fisher
published
2.49
Lynn Stattel
published
2.32
Deanna Busteed
published 2.5
2.29
Marcie Tross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Diaz + Bradley Vineyard3544% games−9.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Paduano
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jacqueline Diaz
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
Rachel Kim
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Angelena Hirzel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Bradley Vineyard
22W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Ann Bauer
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Laureen Matta
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Jacquelyn McVey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cari McBride
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Katherine Virkstis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.68
Mary Leigh Morrison
8W–26L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Susannah Porteous
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Barbara Timblin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.65
Erin Fisher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lynn Stattel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Deanna Busteed
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Marcie Tross
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.