Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Michelle 1030

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-12-15vs OC CMTC - Susie KimLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Lauren Prelesnik vs Susie Kim / Karla Padova5-7, 5-7
2023-12-08vs OC Eldorado TC - LisaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLacey Seward / Tatyana Bukrinsky vs Kristine Hammond / Jackie Betraun6-1, 6-0
2023-12-06vs OC CMTC - Cecilia 10amSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLacey Seward / Michaela Vitrano vs Allegra Fulcher / Dayna Marinos3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAudra Smith / Catherine Fullerton vs Melanie Irwin / Hayley Dobbins6-7, 6-7
2023-12-04vs OC CMTC - Naomi 10amWon 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Fullerton / Lacey Seward vs Michi Sim / Kaeko Jenni6-3, 6-4
2023-11-17vs OC Fullerton TC- Masako 10amWon 10
W#1 DoublesLacey Seward / Audra Smith vs Larissa Tan / Karin Altonaga6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesTiffany Pena / Lacey Seward vs Rosalinda Fazio / Nancy Shih6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-10-27vs OC Yorba Linda CC - ClaudiaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLacey Seward / Audra Smith vs Monica Kirby / Jeanie Attaway6-3, 6-0
2023-10-13vs OC Eldorado TC - LisaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLacey Seward / Tiffany Pena vs Claudia Shea / Cheryl Hansberry6-1, 6-2
2023-10-06vs OC Los Cab - MargaretLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlicia Logan / Erin Nichols vs Jolina Cadilli / Naomi Sugiura5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTatyana Bukrinsky / Lacey Seward vs Rosalinda Fazio / Sarah King3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Pena / Alicia Logan vs Samantha Bloom / Lisa Watkins1-6, 4-6
2023-09-15vs OC Los Cab - Cynthia 10amWon 20
W#1 DoublesTatyana Bukrinsky / Catherine Fullerton vs Karin Wiseman / Linda Hainley6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Nichols / Alicia Logan vs Kristine Byer / Mary Becker6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Audra Smith
published 4
3.76
Catherine Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Lacey Seward
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Lauren Prelesnik
published
3.44
Alicia Logan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Michaela Vitrano
published
3.35
Tiffany Pena
published
3.34
Carmen Johnson
published 3.5
3.26
Natalie Croswell
published
Dina Randazzo
published 3.5
3.18
Edyn Elliott-Barber
published 3.5
2.73
Michelle Schmit
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmen Johnson + Audra Smith5160% games+12.7% vs expected
Lacey Seward + Catherine Fullerton10855% games+9.6% vs expected
Lacey Seward + Carmen Johnson6752% games−0.9% vs expected
Alicia Logan + Michaela Vitrano404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audra Smith
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Lacey Seward
95W–62L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lauren Prelesnik
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Alicia Logan
48W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.44
Michaela Vitrano
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
Tiffany Pena
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Carmen Johnson
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Natalie Croswell
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Dina Randazzo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Edyn Elliott-Barber
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Michelle Schmit
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.