Teams

Bitsy Grant (Stephene Terry)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Monica Murray

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesShannon Hooper vs Catherine Cho6-1, 6-4
2024-06-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesPeggy Davidson / Fong Huang vs Kathy Koppenhofer / Melissa Ngo-Harris6-3, 6-3
2024-06-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Hooper vs Lynda Deeley6-4, 1-6, 6-3
2024-06-23vs Druid Hills (Carrie Parker)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesTiara Zolnierz / Faye Wu vs Stephanie Ricker / Julie Grant6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBing Eastburn vs Lena Murphy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Zimmerman / Kirstin Berglund vs Margaret Harris / Melissa Hills3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCydni Martin vs Christy Brock6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Hooper / Heather Musman vs Carrie Parker / Jamie Bonds6-3, 6-2
2024-06-16Won 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Johnson / Shannon Hooper vs Sarah Kirshner / Lindsay Medwed3-6, 7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesFong Huang vs Julie Hawkins6-2, 6-1
2024-06-16vs McGhee TC (Teika Jackson)*Won 40
W#1 DoublesFaye Wu / Tiara Zolnierz vs Teika Jackson / Xena Whittier6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMarla Aronson vs Davia Dunbar6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristen Donaldson / Kirstin Berglund vs Allison Goins / ONDREA THOMAS7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesBing Eastburn vs Kimberly Johnson6-4, 6-2
2024-06-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesShannon Hooper vs Lynda Deeley7-5, 6-3
2024-06-09vs McGhee TC (Marcella Starks)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesTiara Zolnierz / Faye Wu vs Tracy Booker / Ramona Pinkard6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBing Eastburn vs Jenna Green7-6, 3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSarah Gaudry / Rachel Zimmerman vs Tonya Blanks / Michelle Hansberry7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMarla Aronson vs Sandra Strippoli6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCydni Martin / Kirstin Berglund vs Marijuana Brockington-Shaw / Jacqueline Mosley6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Monica Murray have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Faye Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Tiara Zolnierz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Kirstin Berglund
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Marla Aronson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.49
Rachel Zimmerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Cydni Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Shannon Hooper
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.37
Bing Eastburn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Heather Musman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Fong Huang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Sandy Goldstein
published
2.85
Stephene Terry
published
Jill Flournoy
published
Kristen Donaldson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natasha Travis
published
Nicole Jennings
published
Sarah Gaudry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faye Wu + Tiara Zolnierz6265% games+10.2% vs expected
Rachel Zimmerman + Sarah Gaudry5651% games−3.1% vs expected
Kirstin Berglund + Kristen Donaldson3252% gamesnot enough data
Kirstin Berglund + Faye Wu314 matchesnot enough data
Kirstin Berglund + Marla Aronson303 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Zimmerman + Tiara Zolnierz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Faye Wu
23W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Tiara Zolnierz
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
Kirstin Berglund
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Marla Aronson
35W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Rachel Zimmerman
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Cydni Martin
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Shannon Hooper
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
Bing Eastburn
53W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Heather Musman
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Fong Huang
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Goldstein
45W–66L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Stephene Terry
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85
Jill Flournoy
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Donaldson
22W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natasha Travis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Jennings
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Gaudry
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.