Teams

LA - Sets on Fire

2024 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 4.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesApril Hartstein / David Seidner vs Olivia Burtis / Andrei Duman7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMandi Collier / Bryson Lee vs Jill Bauman / Thomas Burwell6-0, 6-0
2024-02-25vs LA -LLW - LATC Alchemy - Jill BaumanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesApril Hartstein / John Aranda vs Aliya Allyn / Austen Earl1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMandi Collier / Alexander Wood vs Joanna Morley / Andrei Duman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Chloe Kishel vs Olivia Burtis / Edward Oueilhe2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Chandler Nguyen vs Samie Falvey / Edward Oueilhe7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIndia Hoffman / Charles Barrantes vs Lauren DiFazio / Dan Krasner1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.39
Chandler Nguyen
published 4.5
4.37
Alexander Wood
published 4.5
4.34
Bryson Lee
published 4.5
4.29
April Hartstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Christine Chen
published 4.5
4.18
Charles Barrantes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Chloe Kishel
published 4.5
4.10
Bryan Hudson
published 4.5
4.06
Mary Soto
published
4.03
India Hoffman
published
Julie Juliani
published
Matthew Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Hartstein + Mandi Collier7165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Chandler Nguyen
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Alexander Wood
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Bryson Lee
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
April Hartstein
227W–139L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Christine Chen
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Charles Barrantes
138W–93L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Chloe Kishel
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bryan Hudson
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Mary Soto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
India Hoffman
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Craig
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Oleksandr Ostrovskyi
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.