Teams

LA -LLW - LATC Alchemy - Jill Bauman

2024 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles

17 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-23vs LA - Sets on FireLost 01
L#3 DoublesBess Kargman / Samuel Josephs vs Chandler Nguyen / Alexander Wood1-6, 3-6
2024-03-03vs LA - Sets on FireWon 20
W#1 DoublesBess Kargman / Joshua Landau vs Christine Chen / Alexander Wood7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren DiFazio / Samuel Josephs vs John Aranda / Chandler Nguyen6-1, 6-4
2024-01-28vs LA - Sets on FireWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Landau / Lauren DiFazio vs Julie Juliani / Bryson Lee7-5, 6-3
2024-01-07vs LA - Sets on FireWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren DiFazio / Dan Krasner vs India Hoffman / Charles Barrantes6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrei Duman
published 5
4.53
Lauren DiFazio
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Chuck Carrington
published 4.5
Dan Krasner
published 4.5
4.07
Austen Earl
published 4
4.04
Joanna Morley
published
4.02
Samie Falvey
published
3.92
Bess Kargman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Olivia Burtis
published
3.83
Jill Bauman
published
3.77
Michele Weiss
published
3.74
Beverly Castaldo-Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Jenny Louchheim
published
3.58
Nilou Panahpour
published
Ivan Fatovic
published
Janet Comenos
published
Shawn Hatosy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andrei Duman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren DiFazio
122W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.53
4.5
Chuck Carrington
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Dan Krasner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Austen Earl
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
Joanna Morley
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.04
Samie Falvey
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Bess Kargman
43W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.92
Olivia Burtis
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.84
Jill Bauman
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
Michele Weiss
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Beverly Castaldo-Brown
57W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
Jenny Louchheim
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Nilou Panahpour
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Ivan Fatovic
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Comenos
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn Hatosy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.