Teams

KY/LOU/ZINSER

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-14vs KY/LOU/LINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Kramer / Brittany Musick vs Jenn Holland / Emily Lenihan6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKatherine Effinger vs Jennifer Huelsman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Byrne / Kelly Hampton vs Lauren Bisig / Beige Thomas3-6, 2-6
2025-12-06vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Woock / Lindsay Zeller vs Laci Pauley / Michelle Sauer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristina Quigley vs Aneshia Gray6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Embry / Lisa Radcliff vs Pamela Royster / Katie Earley6-1, 6-2
2025-11-23vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Effinger / Kristina Quigley vs Simran Brar / Becky Carothers6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Barger vs Amanda Ives1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Byrne / Brittany Musick vs Christy Ballard / Amanda Scharf7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-09vs KY/LOU/RIVES/NORCIAWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracey Woock / Leslie Pike vs Priya Patel / Janet Witten6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJamie Embry vs Ellen Pitcock2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Hampton / Lisa Radcliff vs Katherine Wardlaw / Brooke Colburn6-4, 7-6
2025-10-18vs KY/LOU/LINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Barger / Lindsay Zeller vs Laura Yeoman / LAURA CRAHAN6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Embry vs Jennifer Huelsman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracey Woock / Kelly Hermann vs Kirisha Golightly / Marianna Boyd6-0, 2-1
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Pike / Rachel Miranda vs Samantha Oerther / Yana Feygin5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Hampton vs Sophia Mobley6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrittany Musick / Megan Zinser vs Michelle Sauer / Katie Earley3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Whitney Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Rachel Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Tracey Woock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.61
Kelly Hampton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.49
Kristina Quigley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Leslie Pike
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Lindsay Zeller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Jill Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Lisa Radcliff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Kelly Hermann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Holly Barger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.17
Jamie Embry
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Brittany Musick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.96
Catie Nelson
published 2.5
Katherine Effinger
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Zinser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Burke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Woock + Lindsay Zeller3445% games+8.5% vs expected
Whitney Kramer + Holly Barger3248% games+1.7% vs expected
Lindsay Zeller + Holly Barger2349% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Woock + Rachel Miranda224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Hermann + Leslie Pike213 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Miranda + Kelly Hampton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Kramer
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Rachel Miranda
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Tracey Woock
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kelly Hampton
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
Kristina Quigley
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
Leslie Pike
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Lindsay Zeller
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37
Jill Byrne
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Lisa Radcliff
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Kelly Hermann
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Holly Barger
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Jamie Embry
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.17
2.5
Brittany Musick
5W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Catie Nelson
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Katherine Effinger
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Zinser
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Burke
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.