Teams

KY/LOU/RIVES/NORCIA

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-21vs KY/LOU/OERTHERLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Wardlaw / Priya Patel vs Donna Thomas / Yana Feygin1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBrooke Colburn vs Katie Archer4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Witten / Kaitlin Diebold vs Pamela Royster / Aneshia Gray6-7, 3-6
2025-12-06vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Bailey / Mollie Shutt vs Amanda Ives / Meghan Myron6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLacey Jurgens / Sara Hall vs Kristin Wurtenberger / Christy Ballard6-4, 7-5
2025-11-23vs KY/LOU/MILLIGAN/CHESSLERWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Rives / Kelsey Norcia vs Ursula Melhuish / Beth Bryant7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Gravely vs Cammie King4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Malone / Sophie Cattermole vs Melissa Webb / Jennifer Park6-1, 6-2
2025-11-09vs KY/LOU/ZINSERLost 12
L#1 DoublesPriya Patel / Janet Witten vs Tracey Woock / Leslie Pike1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEllen Pitcock vs Jamie Embry6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatherine Wardlaw / Brooke Colburn vs Kelly Hampton / Lisa Radcliff4-6, 6-7
2025-11-01vs KY/LOU/SCARBROUGH/SULLIVANLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Hall / Lauren Schmitt vs Tsolmonica Batbold / Robin Scarbrough2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAnna Malone vs Brooke Lampton6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGretchen Zink / Janet Witten vs Diana Mosby / Cyndi Sullivan3-6, 6-7
2025-10-26vs KY/LOU/LINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Hall / Sophie Cattermole vs Emily Lenihan / Megan Mccall6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnna Malone vs Kelley Leopold6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLacey Jurgens / Courtney Morgan vs Megan Imel / Blair Crush6-1, 6-1
2025-10-18vs KY/LOU/OERTHERWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Rives / Kelsey Norcia vs Sara Rocke / Aneshia Gray5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Gravely vs Katie Archer1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Blacketer / Katie Taylor vs Tammie Barrett / Yana Feygin6-4, 6-1
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/IVES/REDENBAUGHSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Malone / Justine Thomas vs Meghan Myron / Nikki Snow6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaitlin Diebold / Gretchen Zink vs Simran Brar / Amanda Scharf7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Sophie Cattermole
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Anna Malone
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Emily Rives
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Lacey Jurgens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Kelsey Norcia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Brooke Colburn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Kaitlin Diebold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Holly Gravely
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.31
Molly Blacketer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Courtney Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ellen Pitcock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Gretchen Zink
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Witten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Justine Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Wardlaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mollie Shutt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Rives + Kelsey Norcia6352% games−1.5% vs expected
Anna Malone + Justine Thomas314 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlin Diebold + Gretchen Zink123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Cattermole
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Anna Malone
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Emily Rives
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Lacey Jurgens
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Kelsey Norcia
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Brooke Colburn
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Kaitlin Diebold
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Holly Gravely
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
Molly Blacketer
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.31
2.5
Courtney Morgan
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ellen Pitcock
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gretchen Zink
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Witten
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justine Thomas
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Wardlaw
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Schmitt
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mollie Shutt
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.