Teams

KY/LOU/SCARBROUGH/SULLIVAN

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.60 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-06vs KY/LOU/LINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiana Mosby / Namuun Gantumur vs Megan Mcguire / Jessica Taylor6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRobin Scarbrough vs Jae Fish6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Bowles-Nesmith / Shannon Wickel vs Emily Hext / Jennifer Huelsman2-6, 2-6
2025-11-23vs KY/LOU/OERTHERLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Nixon / Martha Davis vs Donna Thomas / Sophia Mobley1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNamuun Gantumur vs Yana Feygin6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRenea Berry / Cyndi Sullivan vs Laci Pauley / Michelle Sauer3-6, 3-6
2025-11-15Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Nixon / Annie Beanblossom vs Becky Carothers / Becky Duncan7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrooke Lampton vs Amy Medley1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Bowles-Nesmith / Cyndi Sullivan vs Ashley Redenbaugh / Anne Oliphant6-3, 6-2
2025-11-09vs KY/LOU/MILLIGAN/CHESSLERWon 21
L#1 DoublesDelgertsetseg Batsaikhan / Diana Mosby vs Cammie King / Allison Chessler5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTsolmonica Batbold vs Sophia Mistratov6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrooke Lampton / Martha Davis vs Alex Nessenthaler / Melissa Webb6-1, 6-3
2025-11-01vs KY/LOU/RIVES/NORCIAWon 21
W#1 DoublesTsolmonica Batbold / Robin Scarbrough vs Sara Hall / Lauren Schmitt6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrooke Lampton vs Anna Malone2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDiana Mosby / Cyndi Sullivan vs Gretchen Zink / Janet Witten6-3, 7-6
2025-10-26vs KY/LOU/ZINSERWon 21
W#1 DoublesTsolmonica Batbold / Namuun Gantumur vs Kelly Hermann / Katherine Effinger6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesShannon Wickel vs Kelly Hampton0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Barnett / Diana Mosby vs Tiffany Burke / Brittany Musick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/LINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnie Beanblossom / Cyndi Sullivan vs Abby Link / Kassie Green6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesShannon Wickel vs Jae Fish3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNamuun Gantumur / Kelly Nixon vs Beige Thomas / Michelle Lane6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Namuun Gantumur
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Delgertsetseg Batsaikhan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.62
Cyndi Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.61
Tsolmonica Batbold
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Robin Scarbrough
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
Annie Beanblossom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Linda Rice
published
2.33
Renea Berry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Kelly Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.03
Diana Mosby
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.03
Brooke Lampton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.97
Shannon Wickel
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.92
Kathy Bowles-Nesmith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lissa McCracken
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Namuun Gantumur + Tsolmonica Batbold6164% games+12.9% vs expected
Kelly Nixon + Brooke Lampton2340% games+2.3% vs expected
Kathy Bowles-Nesmith + Shannon Wickel1528% games−6.7% vs expected
Diana Mosby + Lissa McCracken1532% games−11.4% vs expected
Linda Rice + Diana Mosby11423% games−17.4% vs expected
Linda Rice + Kathy Bowles-Nesmith134 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Lampton + Renea Berry044 matchesnot enough data
Linda Rice + Brooke Lampton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Namuun Gantumur
34W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Delgertsetseg Batsaikhan
13W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.62
3
Cyndi Sullivan
18W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Tsolmonica Batbold
22W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Robin Scarbrough
31W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%41%59%
2.53
2.5
Annie Beanblossom
9W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
Linda Rice
7W–45L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.41
Renea Berry
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
Kelly Nixon
20W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Diana Mosby
12W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Brooke Lampton
13W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Shannon Wickel
6W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Kathy Bowles-Nesmith
5W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Lissa McCracken
13W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.