Teams

Bozeman Team

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Women 4.5 - 40 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-07vs Utah CoalitionLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Sarah Tilt vs Jennifer Nicholson / Jane McQuade6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSara Aldinger vs Kochkorn Bailin0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGina Barham / Sunny Cook vs Cyndi Jones / Cathy Davis6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaige Darden / Dotty Ballantyne vs Shanda Stoner / Michelle Moscon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-08-07vs Utah CoalitionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Sara Aldinger vs Cyndi Jones / Angela Kelson6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPaige Darden vs Kecia Dallin3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGina Barham / Sarah Tilt vs Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Jane McQuade6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Bishop / Sunny Cook vs Katy Alder / Pam Ollivier3-6, 3-6
2021-08-06vs Utah CoalitionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGina Barham / Sara Aldinger vs Shanda Stoner / Cathy Davis6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPaige Darden vs Kochkorn Bailin6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Tilt / Sunny Cook vs Christi Metcalf / Michelle Moscon7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Judy Bishop vs Katy Alder / Pam Ollivier3-6, 1-6
2021-08-06vs Utah CoalitionSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDotty Ballantyne / Judy Bishop vs Jane McQuade / Jennifer Nicholson1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSara Aldinger vs Kecia Dallin7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusie Luebbe / Gina Barham vs Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Christi Metcalf6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSunny Cook / Paige Darden vs Angela Kelson / Cyndi Jones4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 - 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Susie Luebbe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Gina Barham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dotty Ballantyne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Paige Darden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Sara Aldinger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Tilt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sunny Cook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Luebbe + Sarah Tilt4160% gamesnot enough data
Gina Barham + Susie Luebbe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie Luebbe
35W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Gina Barham
11W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Dotty Ballantyne
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paige Darden
23W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sara Aldinger
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Tilt
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sunny Cook
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.