Teams

NNM 7.0 JC - Hibray

2023 USTA Mixed 55 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs NNM 7.0 JC - GoldsteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Ellis / Lee Farris vs Lisa Anselmo / Jerome Romero6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Amond / Warren Kinney vs Carl Hohsfield / Lisa Denning0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLorraine Hickman / Darren Hibray vs Ellen Goldstein / Mitchell Levick6-0, 6-1
2023-06-19vs NNM 7.0 JC - BrockWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Amond / Lee Farris vs Patty Amo / Joseph Pecos6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Beavis / Richard Tang vs Katherine Brock / Tim Kildare6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLorraine Hickman / Robert Sacks vs Sherri Smith / Greg Smith7-6, 6-4
2023-06-12vs NNM 7.0 Tanoan - MurphyWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Ellis / Lee Farris vs Glenn Felty / Leslie Prichard6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEdith Jorgio / Richard Tang vs Marcie Rackow / Kirk Rackow6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Amond / Warren Kinney vs Hae-Jung Murphy / Patrick Murphy6-3, 6-2
2023-06-02vs NNM 7.0 TCA - HagemannLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarren Hibray / Lorraine Hickman vs Mary Wommack / Sandy McNeill2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Ellis / Robert Sacks vs Rifka Stern / David Broudy6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaul Johnson / Susan Beavis vs Kevin Kozlowski / Margaret Wienbar4-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs NNM 7.0 SV - FeliceWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdith Jorgio / Richard Tang vs Jane Ryfun / JOSEPH ARCHIBEQUE4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Hickman / Darren Hibray vs Kym Burnett / Ron Owen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Beavis / Paul Johnson vs Samuel Tabet / Monti Miller6-1, 6-1
2023-05-23vs NNM 7.0 ELG - BellaWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Tang / Edith Jorgio vs Christopher Martin / JoAnn Pomeroy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Hickman / Darren Hibray vs Doug Lougee / Carol Moldaw6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYvette Muceno-Plaisted / Warren Kinney vs Melissa Edmon / Steven Richmond7-5, 6-4
2023-05-09vs NNM/Fotieo/Mixed 55 & Over/7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Farris / Christine Ellis vs Robert Beavis / Linda Wilson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWarren Kinney / Yvette Muceno-Plaisted vs Larry Schneider / Joan Yourick2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Sacks / Karen Amond vs Marvin Jimenez / Barbara Shulman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Fotieo/Mixed 55 & Over/7.07018311144
2NNM 7.0 JC - Hibray5215616174
3NNM 7.0 JC - Goldstein52111023187
4NNM 7.0 TCA - Hagemann43111025197
5NNM 7.0 ELG - Bella34101126195
6NNM 7.0 Tanoan - Murphy3491228210
7NNM 7.0 JC - Brock1681328213
8NNM 7.0 SV - Felice0721939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Edith Jorgio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Susan Beavis
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.34
Darren Hibray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Yvette Muceno-Plaisted
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Christine Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen Amond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lee Farris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lorraine Hickman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Tang
published
Robert Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Warren Kinney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorraine Hickman + Darren Hibray8457% gamesnot enough data
Warren Kinney + Yvette Muceno-Plaisted224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Sacks + Karen Amond033 matchesnot enough data
Warren Kinney + Karen Amond123 matchesnot enough data
Lee Farris + Christine Ellis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edith Jorgio
24W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Susan Beavis
83W–125L career · 7 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Darren Hibray
113W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.34
Yvette Muceno-Plaisted
40W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Ellis
113W–169L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Karen Amond
35W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Lee Farris
18W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorraine Hickman
26W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Tang
38W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Sacks
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Warren Kinney
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.