Richard Tang
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
96 matches · 55W–41L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history96 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2024
NNM 7.0M Martinez-JC
3.0M JC-McDermott
NNM 3.0M HP - Moller
NNM 7.0 JC - Hibray
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
NNM/Chambliss/55 & Over/7.0M
NNM 3.0M - Robinson
NNM 3.0M ACC - Gonzales
NNM 6.0MX JC - Chambliss
NNM 6.0MX JC - Nguyen
NNM 7.0M Chambliss
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
NNM 7.0MX Tanoan - Youngberg
NNM 3.0M JC - Nguyen
NNM 3.0M JC - Nguyen
NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss
NNM 7.0MX JC - Muceno-Plaisted
NNM 7.0MX JC - Ellis
Southwest/Chambliss/65 & Over7.0 Men
NNM3.0M18_Pham_JC
NNM3.0M40_Pham_JC
NNM7.0M55_Cleveland_JC
NNM7.0M65_Panzarella_JC
NNM7.0X18_Andres_JC
NNM7.0X40_Andres_JC
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.5%
25W–15L · 54.8% of games
7.0
47.1%
16W–18L · 49.9% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 58.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.