Mitchell Levick
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
114 matches · 61W–53L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history114 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2025
NNM 3.5M Briggs - JC
NNM/Briggs/55 & Over/7.0M
NNM/Gee/65 & Over/7.0M
3.5M JC-Briggs
4.0M TCA-Rising
NNM 3.5M HP - Dunbar
NNM 7.0 JC - Briggs
NNM 7.0 JC - Goldstein
NNM 7.0M HP - Dunbar
NNM 8.0 JC - Briggs
NNM/Briggs/40 & Over Mixed/7.0
NNMWC/Briggs/55 & Over/7.0M
NNM 3.5M HP - Dunbar
NNM 3.5M JC - Briggs
NNM 7.0M JC - Briggs
NNM 7.0MX JC - Briggs
NNM 7.0MX VR - Briggs
NNM 3.5M JC - Briggs
NNM 3.5M Tanoan - Barriga
NNM 4.0M JC - Rising
NNM 4.0M Lobo Club - Rising
NNM 7.0M JC - Levick
NNM 7.0MX VR - Briggs
NNM TriM HP - Barker
NNM 3.5M JC - Briggs
NNM 4.0M JC - Rising
NNM 7.0MX NDB - Tarleton
NNM3.5M40_Briggs_JC
NNM4.0M40_Gibbon_HP
NNM3.5M18_Briggs_JC
NNM3.5M40_Briggs_JC
NNM4.0M18_Rising_JC
NNM4.0M40_Rising_JC
NNM7.0M55_Levick_JC
NNM7.0X18_Gomez_Tan
NNM7.0X40_Hohsfield_JC
NNM8.0M55_Dent_JC
NNMTriM_Rising_JC
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.7%
19W–20L · 48% of games
4.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 47.7% of games
7.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.9% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
17 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.