Teams

Taylordean/Collins 3.0 40 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-15vs Driscoll 3.0 40s MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesLibby Wilson / Gayle Taylordean vs Jennifer Murphy / Meghan Hilleboe3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-08vs Davis/Varner 3.0 40s MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesGayle Taylordean / Libby Wilson vs Susan Stull / Jamie Cunningham6-2, 7-5
2023-04-24vs Driscoll 3.0 40s MonLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristin Gile / Libby Wilson vs Page Kreager / Lora Snyder2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
2.94
Kristin Gile
published
2.89
Libby Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Lauren Collins
published
2.85
Gracia Tilley
published 3
2.81
Elena Karpova
published 3
2.68
Joyce Chamblee
published
2.68
Gayle Taylordean
published 3
2.66
Wendy Ingle
published
2.50
Lourdes Elder
published
Margot Jozefowicz
published
Melody Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Gile + Lauren Collins314 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Gile + Gayle Taylordean033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Britt Molitoris
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Kristin Gile
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
Libby Wilson
56W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lauren Collins
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Gracia Tilley
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Elena Karpova
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
2.81
Joyce Chamblee
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Gayle Taylordean
10W–28L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Wendy Ingle
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Lourdes Elder
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Margot Jozefowicz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melody Davis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.