← Search

Melody Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 27W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history57 matches
W
2026-04-27 · Cathey/Fields 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Chandler Batchelor
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · Cathey/Fields 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Celestial Corridon
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2025-05-05 · Pitts/Cathey 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Cathers
loading the estimate
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-28 · Pitts/Cathey 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberley Cathey
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-14 · Pitts/Cathey 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Celestial Corridon
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-10-02 · Pitts/Cathey 40s 5.5 Combo W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melisa Lyles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-26 · Cathers/Pitts 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiana Pitts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-09-18 · Pitts/Cathey 40s 5.5 Combo W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-08-22 · Cathers/Pitts 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginger Ballard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-08-21 · Pitts/Cathey 40s 5.5 Combo W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Bethel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-08-03 · Cathers/Pitts 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberley Cathey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-13 · Cathey/Pitts 3.0W 40s Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Adams
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63%
17W–10L · 54.8% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.2% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.8% of games
6.5
25%
4W–12L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe