Teams

Corey Noel X9.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over MIXIN' IT UP Weekend Event · X9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.62 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-26vs Yvon Pho X9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCorey Noel / Maki Berman vs Clint Cash / Elise Jeffery1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJean Nguyen / Kristen Volz vs William Shaw / Lana Fulkerson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBen Hawkins / Eri Matsumoto vs Burak Berksoy / Yvon Pho6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-04-25vs Carrie Currier/Shawn Phelan X9.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesCorey Noel / Kristen Volz vs Carrie Currier / Chris Ellis2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBen Hawkins / Eri Matsumoto vs Mark Lafavre / Sonia Moorthy6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrandon Myers / HIROE BLACKLEDGE vs Teri Ware / Kenji Hashimoto6-7, 2-6
2026-04-25vs Aubrey Findley X9.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBen Hawkins / Eri Matsumoto vs Aubrey Findley / Michael Kelly6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrandon Myers / Maki Berman vs Jackie Reily / Wil Saqueton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCorey Noel / Kristen Volz vs Vanessa Kelley / Craig Markley5-7, 1-6
2026-04-24vs Scott Anders X9.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesEri Matsumoto / Ben Hawkins vs Heather Turck / Terry Traylor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Nguyen / HIROE BLACKLEDGE vs Akos Osvath / Emily Lu6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaki Berman / Brandon Myers vs Jason Turck / Courtney McClurkin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · X9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aubrey Findley X9.0317512108
2Carrie Currier/Shawn Phelan X9.0317512117
3Yvon Pho X9.022751198
4Corey Noel X9.0226616118
5Scott Anders X9.0043919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Deb Nguyen
published 5
4.44
Corey Noel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Eri Matsumoto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Jean Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
HIROE BLACKLEDGE
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Maki Berman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Steven Riddle
published
Kristen Volz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maki Berman + HIROE BLACKLEDGE6552% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Deb Nguyen
9W–13L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
Corey Noel
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.44
4.5
Eri Matsumoto
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.38
Jean Nguyen
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
HIROE BLACKLEDGE
35W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.20
Maki Berman
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.14
Steven Riddle
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Kristen Volz
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.