Teams

Scott Anders X9.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over MIXIN' IT UP Weekend Event · X9.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-26vs Aubrey Findley X9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Traylor / Heather Turck vs Aubrey Findley / Michael Kelly2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJason Turck / Courtney McClurkin vs Vanessa Kelley / Craig Markley2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Ewing / Candice Ewing vs Jackie Reily / Wil Saqueton6-2, 7-5
2026-04-26vs Carrie Currier/Shawn Phelan X9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Traylor / Emily Lu vs Shawn Phelan / Sonia Moorthy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Ewing / Candice Ewing vs Lloyd McGuire / Holly Kerr4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAkos Osvath / Heather Turck vs Chris Ellis / Carrie Currier6-1, 6-2
2026-04-25vs Yvon Pho X9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney McClurkin / Jason Turck vs Maria Lopez / David Kirk2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAkos Osvath / Emily Lu vs Clint Cash / Yvon Pho7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Ewing / Candice Ewing vs Seth Giertz / Elise Jeffery2-6, 2-6
2026-04-24vs Corey Noel X9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Turck / Terry Traylor vs Eri Matsumoto / Ben Hawkins6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAkos Osvath / Emily Lu vs Jean Nguyen / HIROE BLACKLEDGE3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Turck / Courtney McClurkin vs Maki Berman / Brandon Myers6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · X9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aubrey Findley X9.0317512108
2Carrie Currier/Shawn Phelan X9.0317512117
3Yvon Pho X9.022751198
4Corey Noel X9.0226616118
5Scott Anders X9.0043919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Courtney McClurkin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.37
Terry Traylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Akos Osvath
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Heather Turck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Emily Lu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Candice Ewing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jason Turck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey Ewing
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Ewing + Candice Ewing123 matchesnot enough data
Jason Turck + Courtney McClurkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Courtney McClurkin
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
4.46
Terry Traylor
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Akos Osvath
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Heather Turck
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Emily Lu
22W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Candice Ewing
46W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Jason Turck
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Ewing
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.