Teams

Wagon Wheel/Hayes W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesBecki Craft / Rachel Hayes vs Amy Hilliard / Terry Cass6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmber Hupp vs Krissy Zylka6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoAnn Eubank / Christina Hamm vs Diane Lanzone / Kathleen Nuytten3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMaryAnne Criswell / Deanna Sullivan vs Sherri Spruill / Mindy Brummett6-1, 6-0
2025-03-07vs Lakes @ CH/SpringerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryAnne Criswell / Cara Kist vs Miki Heiss / Carrie Strahan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristina Hamm vs Christina Norrie3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kelly / Amber Hupp vs Holly Paniagua / Theresa Premjee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-28vs Stonebridge/Graham-Martinson W3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDiana Ahmad vs Heather Jordan2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Miller / Lana Johnson vs Kristie Anderson / Kelly Killinger2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Hayes / Ruth Sine vs Christine Daugherty / Christine Lutz6-4, 6-2
2025-01-31vs High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMaryAnne Criswell / Deanna Sullivan vs Jennifer Doublesin / Shanna Claytor1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDiana Ahmad vs Jennifer Minchenko6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rogerson / JoAnn Eubank vs Edilia Bern / Michelle Sowards1-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs Stonebriar/Boyd-Smith W3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Miller / Lana Johnson vs Suelyn Boyd / Joy Cruse0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Ahmad / Jennifer Kelly vs Mindy Casas / Amy Titus2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Hamm / JoAnn Eubank vs Sara Kremin / Cari Zurlis6-4, 6-0
2025-01-17vs Cooper Fitness/Liechty-Moore W3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLacy Frenzel / Diana Ahmad vs Rebecca Scott / Callie Nixon7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Hupp / Ruth Sine vs Sheri Law / Angie Wood7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJoAnn Eubank / Deanna Sullivan vs Cari Jackson / Leanne Moore6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Kaley Medina
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Lacy Frenzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Diana Ahmad
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Cara Kist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Ruth Sine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Lana Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Deanna Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Mahtab Abghari
published
Becki Craft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christina Hamm
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
JoAnn Eubank
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
MaryAnne Criswell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Amber Hupp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.42
Jennifer Rogerson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janie Garrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaley Medina + Lacy Frenzel4156% games+13.6% vs expected
Ruth Sine + Mahtab Abghari5457% games−4.2% vs expected
Amber Hupp + Ruth Sine224 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Sullivan + MaryAnne Criswell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaley Medina
39W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.57
Lacy Frenzel
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Diana Ahmad
27W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Cara Kist
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Ruth Sine
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lana Johnson
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Deanna Sullivan
27W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Mahtab Abghari
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Becki Craft
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Christina Hamm
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
JoAnn Eubank
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
MaryAnne Criswell
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Amber Hupp
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jennifer Rogerson
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Janie Garrett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.