Teams

Cooper Fitness/Liechty-Moore W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.08 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKaty Brown / Angie Wood vs Krissy Zylka / Mindy Brummett6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCari Jackson / Sheri Law vs Laney LaCorte / Kathleen Nuytten3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-02-28vs Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesAllison Bowen vs Connie Wentz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeanne Moore / Abby Liechty vs Maureen Jackson / Sarah Zavala6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJenny Green / Katy Brown vs Megan Sun / Mysti Stewart6-1, 6-0
2025-02-26vs Lakes @ CH/SpringerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHilary Baker / Allison Bowen vs Holly Paniagua / Kristin Rogers6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAbby Liechty / Stacey Staples vs Carrie Strahan / Nicole Schneekloth3-6, 4-6
2025-02-14vs High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStacey Staples / Abby Liechty vs Lola Yee / Miyoung Kim4-6, 5-7
2025-02-07vs Stonebridge/Graham-Martinson W3.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesHilary Baker / Allison Bowen vs Lea Ellsworth / Carrie Martinson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAbby Liechty / Leanne Moore vs Christine Daugherty / Jennifer Griffiths7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-31vs Stonebriar/Boyd-Smith W3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAngie Wood / Hilary Baker vs Joy Cruse / Julie Rinker6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Bowen / Karen Rector vs Suelyn Boyd / Rosita Smith7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCari Jackson / Jenny Green vs Veronica Esquino / Jenny Swain0-6, 1-6
2025-01-24vs Samuell Grand/Jordan-Taylor W3.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesAllison Bowen / Hilary Baker vs Sasha Waida / Annie Grant6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeanne Moore / Abby Liechty vs Brianna East / Lindsey Smith6-0, 6-1
2025-01-17vs Wagon Wheel/Hayes W3.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesSheri Law / Angie Wood vs Amber Hupp / Ruth Sine6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCari Jackson / Leanne Moore vs JoAnn Eubank / Deanna Sullivan7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Angie Wood
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.40
Rebecca Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.39
Marianna Clement
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Karen Rector
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Allison Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.02
Katy Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Callie Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.99
Abby Liechty
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.97
Hilary Baker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Leanne Moore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Lindsay Key
published
2.68
Cari Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Alison Reinke
published 3
Jenny Green
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheri Law
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Staples
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Scott + Callie Nixon6165% games+15.3% vs expected
Rebecca Scott + Angie Wood25367% games+13.7% vs expected
Hilary Baker + Allison Bowen4352% gamesnot enough data
Callie Nixon + Allison Bowen3353% gamesnot enough data
Leanne Moore + Abby Liechty3260% gamesnot enough data
Katy Brown + Cari Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Moore + Cari Jackson303 matchesnot enough data
Abby Liechty + Stacey Staples123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Wood
43W–8L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Rebecca Scott
39W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Marianna Clement
23W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Karen Rector
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Allison Bowen
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Katy Brown
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Callie Nixon
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Abby Liechty
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Hilary Baker
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Leanne Moore
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Lindsay Key
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cari Jackson
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alison Reinke
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Jenny Green
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheri Law
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Staples
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.