Teams

Samuell Grand/Jordan-Taylor W3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesAllison Garthoff / Debbie Jordan vs Diane Lanzone / Kathleen Nuytten6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Taylor / Sasha Waida vs Mindy Brummett / Laney LaCorte6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEvy Dinsmore / Brianna East vs Sherri Spruill / Jana Barnes2-6, 3-6
2025-02-07vs Lakes @ CH/SpringerLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrandi Stafford / Debbie Jordan vs Karen Springer / Brooke Martin1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEvy Dinsmore / Sasha Waida vs Nicole Schneekloth / Theresa Premjee4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Snodgrass / Brianna East vs Kristin Rogers / Carrie Strahan3-6, 2-6
2025-01-24vs Cooper Fitness/Liechty-Moore W3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesNancy Taylor / Brandi Stafford vs Callie Nixon / Jamie Womack2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDebbie Jordan vs Rebecca Scott3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSasha Waida / Annie Grant vs Allison Bowen / Hilary Baker1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrianna East / Lindsey Smith vs Leanne Moore / Abby Liechty0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Debbie Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Evy Dinsmore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Brandi Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Sasha Waida
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Allison Garthoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Annie Grant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Brianna East
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lisa Snodgrass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Jordan + Brandi Stafford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debbie Jordan
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Evy Dinsmore
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Brandi Stafford
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Sasha Waida
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Allison Garthoff
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Annie Grant
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brianna East
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Lisa Snodgrass
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.