Teams

COLONY CLUB 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Julia Fung
published
3.81
Donelle Paisley
published 4
3.68
Sarah Simnett
published
3.66
Claire Sheehan
published 4
3.64
Jillian Gee
published
3.59
Val Swan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Karen Toledo
published
3.47
Lauren Denenberg
published
3.42
Stephanie Finley
published
3.39
Tammy Mason
published
3.35
Sharon Yee
published
3.27
Katie Spielman
published
3.25
Cathleen Ligman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Mari Fowler
published
2.94
Lucy Gillies
published
Linda S Walker
published
Masha Lobastov
published
Mila Paul
published
Stacey McCutcheon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Sheehan + Sarah Simnett4843% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Fung
29W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Donelle Paisley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
Sarah Simnett
25W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Claire Sheehan
15W–18L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jillian Gee
26W–46L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
Val Swan
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Karen Toledo
31W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Lauren Denenberg
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Stephanie Finley
16W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Tammy Mason
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.39
Sharon Yee
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Katie Spielman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cathleen Ligman
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Mari Fowler
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Lucy Gillies
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Linda S Walker
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Masha Lobastov
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mila Paul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey McCutcheon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.