Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 18AM3.5A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-16vs FREMONT TC 18AM3.5CWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Govind Duddi6-3, 6-3
2023-06-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Ali Jafri - (DQ)*1-6, 4-6
2023-06-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Michael Xie6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Dana Dominguez7-6, 6-2
2023-05-08vs DIAMOND HILLS 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Mithilesh Salunke6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-07vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5BWon 10
W#2 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Satyendra Sharma4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-29vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5BWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Ramesh Konitineni6-4, 6-4
2023-04-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Greg Snyder6-0, 6-2
2023-04-10vs ROUND HILL CC 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesKeane Tarrosa vs Ken Haworth6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Keane Tarrosa
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.69
Brian Hennessy
published 4
3.61
Jim Collins
published
3.55
John Gwynn
published
3.48
Albert Blake
published 3.5
3.39
Mark Joseph
published
3.28
Shankar Krishna
published
AJ Canepa
published 3.5
Chris Dundon
published 3.5
Ed Nakagawa
published 3.5
3.22
Patrick Wu
published
3.17
Peter Snowden
published
2.99
Mark Keeling
published
2.69
Jonathan Degg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Joseph + Jim Collins5074% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Keane Tarrosa
95W–59L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Brian Hennessy
29W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Jim Collins
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.61
John Gwynn
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Albert Blake
19W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Mark Joseph
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Shankar Krishna
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
AJ Canepa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Chris Dundon
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ed Nakagawa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patrick Wu
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Peter Snowden
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Mark Keeling
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
Jonathan Degg
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.