Teams

MCampbell

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-30vs JCrawfordWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Wurth Drummond vs Cara Kuremsky / Jenna Dysart6-4, 6-0
2022-04-23vs PHankersonWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary Penn Lunger / Wurth Drummond vs Mary Marshall Easley / Ashley McRae7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTiffany Barrier vs Elizabeth Taylor6-2, 7-6
2022-04-02vs JBrownWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Wurth Drummond vs Julie Shuey / Nicole Fishbough7-6, 6-2
2022-03-26vs MTulenkoWon 10
W#2 DoublesTiffany Barrier / Mary-Peyton Amburn vs Frederica Shipman / Cheryl Sweitzer6-0, 6-1
2022-03-21vs DLapeLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Maynard / Wurth Drummond vs Lori Jensen / Caroline Fungaroli0-6, 4-6
2022-03-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesWurth Drummond / Tiffany Barrier vs Anna Jones / Liz Miller6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Laura Capps
published
3.71
Tiffany Barrier
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Jackie Caprio
published 4
3.58
Meggy Campbell
published
3.58
Mary Penn Lunger
published
3.54
Emily Cutts
published 4
3.30
Lauren Stump
published
3.13
Mary-Peyton Amburn
published
3.05
Wurth Drummond
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Capps + Jackie Caprio3348% games−8.1% vs expected
Tiffany Barrier + Wurth Drummond314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Capps
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Tiffany Barrier
145W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Jackie Caprio
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Meggy Campbell
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Mary Penn Lunger
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Emily Cutts
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Lauren Stump
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Mary-Peyton Amburn
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Wurth Drummond
32W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.