Teams

JBrown

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-07vs EZimmerman Sat 3.5 teamLost 01
L#2 SinglesGenevieve Daurity vs Leah Curran4-6, 4-6
2022-04-30Lost 02
L#2 SinglesGenevieve Daurity vs Ashley Walker6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Panebianco / Nicole Fishbough vs Ella Schwochert / Lindsey Petrick3-6, 1-6
2022-04-23vs JCrawfordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Lambe / Laura Panebianco vs Megan Bennett / Lauren Margulies1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGenevieve Daurity vs Jennifer Bissette6-0, 6-1
2022-04-14vs PHankersonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Shuey / Genevieve Daurity vs Pamela Hankerson / Roberta Hadley1-6, 3-6
2022-04-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesLaura Panebianco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-26vs MEverittSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Panebianco / Lisa Sun vs Lola Jefferies / Elizabeth Schuette2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Shuey / Genevieve Daurity vs Amy Ellis / Jennifer Black4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-22vs CConzola 18+ 3.5Lost 02
L#2 SinglesGenevieve Daurity vs Minh NguyenLe0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Panebianco / Juli Johnson vs Anna Jones / Liz Miller1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Ashley McCollum
published 3.5
3.32
Lena Gott
published
3.20
Sharyn Leaver
published
3.06
Sharon Lambe
published
2.98
Laura Panebianco
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Genevieve Daurity
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.87
Julie Shuey
published
2.75
Lisa Sun
published
2.74
Molly Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genevieve Daurity + Laura Panebianco4845% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley McCollum
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Lena Gott
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Sharyn Leaver
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Sharon Lambe
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Laura Panebianco
100W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Genevieve Daurity
54W–73L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Julie Shuey
11W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Lisa Sun
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Molly Clark
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.