Teams

EZimmerman Sat 3.5 team

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-15vs MCampbellLost 02
L#1 SinglesLeah Curran vs Emily Wood1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Martin / Sarah Soleim vs Jackie Caprio / Meggy Campbell0-6, 0-6
2022-05-07vs JBrownLost 12
L#2 DoublesJennifer Martin / Sarah Soleim vs Lena Gott / Julie Shuey4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesLeah Curran vs Genevieve Daurity6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHilary Tew / Ellen Zimmerman vs Sharon Lambe / Molly Clark0-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs MTulenkoLost 02
L#1 SinglesLeah Curran vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDelia Burnett / Sarah Soleim vs Michele Storr / Shannon Littleton2-6, 0-6
2022-04-23vs CConzola 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeah Curran / Elizabeth Short vs Susan Cokas / Heather Roberts6-4, 6-4
2022-04-09vs DLapeLost 12
L#1 DoublesBernice Simmons / Hilary Tew vs Amber Cagle / Lori Jensen1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Soleim vs Nancy Pack1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney Leab / Emily Nelson vs Donna Misa / Daphne Poulk6-1, 6-4
2022-04-02vs MEverittLost 02
L#1 DoublesBailey Wilson / Leah Curran vs Melissa House / Elizabeth Schuette0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesWhitney Leab vs Angelica Rose1-6, 2-6
2022-03-29vs PHankersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesWhitney Leab / Leah Curran vs Phoebe Hill / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall4-6, 2-6
2022-03-28vs JCrawfordWon 30
W#2 DoublesSarah Soleim / Whitney Leab vs Cara Kuremsky / Jessica Crawford6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLeah Curran vs Kellie Chesson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBailey Wilson / Hilary Tew vs Lauren Margulies / Elizabeth Minto6-1, 7-6
2022-03-26vs LKempfWon 20
W#2 DoublesHilary Tew / Sarah Soleim vs Gillian Kelleher / Marina Barthalmus6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeah Curran vs Ashley Walker5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Hilary Tew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Whitney Leab
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Short
published 3.5
3.12
Leah Curran
usually #1 Singles 54%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
2.77
Sarah Soleim
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Donna Hovis
published 3
2.38
Rebecca Glendy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hilary Tew
65W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Whitney Leab
59W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Elizabeth Short
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Leah Curran
109W–76L career · 12 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Sarah Soleim
22W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Donna Hovis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Glendy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.