Teams

SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run / Manheim

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesCraig Shugert / Joe Manheim vs David Wexhler / Michael Tedesco1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBob Boehnlein / Jack Steenstra vs David Kulik / Sean Loghman5-7, 3-6
2022-11-06vs SDNC 4.0 Park Hyatt Aviara/ TiltonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Manheim / Robert Lozano vs Jason Vint / Eugene Hotta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJoe Manheim / Craig Shugert vs Bill Lenaway / Evan Green4-6, 1-6
2022-10-23vs SDNC WC 4.0 KCP/ NguyenLost 01
L#2 DoublesBob Boehnlein / Joe Manheim vs Jason Char / Billy Arenas1-6, 1-6
2022-10-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJack Steenstra / Joe Manheim vs Brian Carlos / Ronan Brown3-6, 1-6
2022-09-25vs SDNC 4.0 San Dieguito TC/ LinWon 10
W#3 DoublesCraig Shugert / Joe Manheim vs Richard Sanders / Burt Blackwell6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJack Steenstra / Richard Gaines vs Tushar Menon / Sirius Yoo2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Craig Shugert
published 4
3.73
Jack Steenstra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
John Jastremski
published
3.68
Ray Adams
published
3.63
Richard Gaines
published
3.53
Tim MacDonald
published
3.51
Robert Lozano
published
3.43
Joe Manheim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.24
Bob Boehnlein
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Manheim + Tim MacDonald224 matchesnot enough data
Joe Manheim + Jack Steenstra134 matchesnot enough data
Ray Adams + Richard Gaines123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Shugert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jack Steenstra
34W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
John Jastremski
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Ray Adams
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Richard Gaines
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Tim MacDonald
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Robert Lozano
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Joe Manheim
119W–159L career · 6 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Bob Boehnlein
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.