Teams

SDNC WC 4.0 KCP/ Nguyen

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - SDNC · SDNC Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesJason Char / Billy Arenas vs Andrew Ma / Sirius Yoo0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-06vs SDNC 4.0 San Dieguito TC/ LinWon 10
W#2 DoublesBilly Arenas / Jason Char vs Stepan Kartsub / Robert Froyd6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBilly Arenas / Andrew Nguyen vs Scott Williams / Eugene Hotta6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJason Char / Duc Phuc Nguyen vs Scott Tilton / Jason Vint6-3, 6-1
2022-10-23vs SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run / ManheimWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Char / Billy Arenas vs Bob Boehnlein / Joe Manheim6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJason Char / Billy Arenas vs Praveen Reddy Mallu / Michael Harlan6-0, 6-1
2022-10-02vs SDNC 4.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC/ WormsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJason Char / Billy Arenas vs Wolfram Worms / Jon Corn6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDuc Phuc Nguyen / Marc Kieu vs Brian Munce / Ronan Brown7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarc Kieu / Ignacio Medina vs Omar Bouhaddou / Alekso Stankoski6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Char / Billy Arenas vs Moffitt Timlake / Michael Tedesco6-1, 6-3
2022-09-18vs SDNC 4.0 RB S&TC / RobergeWon 10
W#2 DoublesBilly Arenas / Andrew Nguyen vs Julian Louis / Wilfredo Soria4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Jason Char
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.98
Billy Arenas
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Pajseu Lochungvu
published
3.83
Marc Kieu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Steven Hoang
published
Kenny Rosenberg
published
Teofilo Beltran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Billy Arenas + Jason Char10167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jason Char
92W–45L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
4.17
4
Billy Arenas
68W–33L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.98
Pajseu Lochungvu
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Marc Kieu
24W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Steven Hoang
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Kenny Rosenberg
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teofilo Beltran
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.