Teams

NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M6.0

2024 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 6.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-29vs DTC #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlfredo Sabillo / Khanh Nguyen vs Jeff Hartman / Sandy Mann7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Forbile / Reynaldo Braganza vs Thomas Standish / Fernando Prieto6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Mooc / Michael Rosenthal vs John Terry / George Pietro6-1, 6-1
2024-05-15vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesCharles Forbile / Alfredo Sabillo vs Ken Kesick / Johnny Underwood4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesReynaldo Braganza / Jabo Tang vs Thomas Schinabeck / John Abihider6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMeynardo Sanchez / Ted Dela Cruz vs Derek Hay / Glenn Kroge6-2, 6-1
2024-05-08vs DTC #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesScott Hawkins / Khanh Nguyen vs George Pietro / Ronald Schmid6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJabo Tang / Bill Mooc vs Brian P Curtin / Stephen Cereghino6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMeynardo Sanchez / Ted Dela Cruz vs Jeffrey Gobel / Sandy Mann7-6, 7-6
2024-04-24vs RED ROCK CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Rudolph / Ted Dela Cruz vs Ken Kesick / Scot Martin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Hawkins / Bill Mooc vs Jose Avila / Thomas Schinabeck6-0, 6-2
2024-04-17vs DTC #1Won 21
W#1 DoublesBill Mooc / Willord Ortanez vs Dan Adamson / George Pietro6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesScott Hawkins / Khanh Nguyen vs Fernando Prieto / Ronald Schmid6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Rudolph / Michael Rosenthal vs Michael Gifford / Sandy Mann4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-03vs RED ROCK CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRod Faircloth / Ted Dela Cruz vs Johnny Underwood / Ken Kesick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Hawkins / Khanh Nguyen vs Jose Avila / Scot Martin6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBill Mooc / Willord Ortanez vs Brian Brancato / Neil Mullins6-1, 6-3
2024-03-27vs DTC #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Rudolph / Ted Dela Cruz vs Jeffrey Gobel / Sandy Mann6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Forbile / Khanh Nguyen vs KRISTON QUALLS / Ronald Schmid6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJabo Tang / Bill Mooc vs Jeff Hartman / Thomas Standish6-1, 6-3
2024-03-13vs RED ROCK CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRod Faircloth / Michael Rosenthal vs Ken Kesick / Scot Martin2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTed Dela Cruz / PEPITO RONQUILLO vs Jose Avila / Damien Jordan5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesScott Hawkins / Reynaldo Braganza vs Glenn Kroge / Derek Hay6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 6.0 MEN- 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M6.07120411146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Rod Faircloth
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Bill Mooc
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charles Forbile
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alfredo Sabillo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jabo Tang
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Meynardo Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Rosenthal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Rudolph
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
PEPITO RONQUILLO
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Reynaldo Braganza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ted Dela Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Willord Ortanez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rosenthal + Scott Hawkins5457% gamesnot enough data
Jabo Tang + Charles Forbile7067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rod Faircloth
299W–305L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bill Mooc
8W–0L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Charles Forbile
18W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Alfredo Sabillo
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jabo Tang
63W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meynardo Sanchez
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Rosenthal
25W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Rudolph
7W–18L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
PEPITO RONQUILLO
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Reynaldo Braganza
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Hawkins
10W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ted Dela Cruz
31W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Willord Ortanez
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.