Teams

RED ROCK CC

2024 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 6.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-22vs DTC #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Johnny Underwood vs Stephen Cereghino / Jeff Hartman6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNeil Mullins / John Abihider vs Fernando Prieto / Sandy Mann3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScot Martin / Glenn Kroge vs Michael Gifford / Brian P Curtin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-05-15vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M6.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKen Kesick / Johnny Underwood vs Charles Forbile / Alfredo Sabillo6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / John Abihider vs Reynaldo Braganza / Jabo Tang4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDerek Hay / Glenn Kroge vs Meynardo Sanchez / Ted Dela Cruz2-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs DTC #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesJohnny Underwood / Thomas Schinabeck vs Stephen Cereghino / Sandy Mann1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScot Martin / Brian Brancato vs KRISTON QUALLS / Ronald Schmid6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Abihider / Damien Jordan vs Jeff Hartman / Thomas Standish6-1, 3-2
2024-04-24vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKen Kesick / Scot Martin vs Michael Rudolph / Ted Dela Cruz2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJose Avila / Thomas Schinabeck vs Scott Hawkins / Bill Mooc0-6, 2-6
2024-04-10vs DTC #1Won 21
W#1 DoublesKen Kesick / Jose Avila vs Jeffrey Gobel / Jeff Hartman7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Brancato / Scot Martin vs Dan Adamson / George Pietro6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Abihider / Johnny Underwood vs Stephen Cereghino / Fernando Prieto2-6, 4-6
2024-04-03vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohnny Underwood / Ken Kesick vs Rod Faircloth / Ted Dela Cruz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJose Avila / Scot Martin vs Scott Hawkins / Khanh Nguyen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Brancato / Neil Mullins vs Bill Mooc / Willord Ortanez1-6, 3-6
2024-03-20vs DTC #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Johnny Underwood vs Brian P Curtin / Sandy Mann6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Brancato / John Abihider vs KRISTON QUALLS / Ronald Schmid3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDerek Hay / Neil Mullins vs Stephen Cereghino / Jeff Hartman0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-03-13vs NV/SABILLO/ADULT55&OVER/M6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesKen Kesick / Scot Martin vs Rod Faircloth / Michael Rosenthal6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJose Avila / Damien Jordan vs Ted Dela Cruz / PEPITO RONQUILLO7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGlenn Kroge / Derek Hay vs Scott Hawkins / Reynaldo Braganza2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Ken Kesick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Derek Hay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Thomas Schinabeck
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Scot Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Brian Brancato
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Johnny Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.61
Damien Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Neil Mullins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Glenn Kroge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
John Abihider
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jose Avila
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Schinabeck + Ken Kesick4160% games+4.9% vs expected
Johnny Underwood + Thomas Schinabeck9257% games+1.8% vs expected
Brian Brancato + Scot Martin9752% games+1.3% vs expected
Scot Martin + Ken Kesick6166% gamesnot enough data
Jose Avila + Damien Jordan4260% gamesnot enough data
Derek Hay + Neil Mullins2344% gamesnot enough data
Derek Hay + Glenn Kroge3254% gamesnot enough data
Johnny Underwood + John Abihider4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ken Kesick
144W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Derek Hay
27W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Schinabeck
95W–117L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Scot Martin
157W–152L career · 12 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Brian Brancato
221W–176L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Johnny Underwood
135W–120L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Damien Jordan
41W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Neil Mullins
37W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Glenn Kroge
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Abihider
16W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Avila
66W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.