Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 18MX8.0B

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

22 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Herve Alexanian
published
4.24
Brandon Kim
published 4.5
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
published
4.14
Sang Gyum Kim
published
4.08
Emese Erdos
published
4.00
Anja Brau
published 4.5
3.85
3.84
Daniel Kroes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Donna Kaneko
published
3.78
Shani Podell
published
3.77
Sean Felder
published
3.75
Wade Conklin
published
3.71
Evan Wong
published
3.57
Allison Don
published 4
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
published
3.53
Rodley Fabie
published
3.27
Anna Wielosz
published 3.5
3.26
Laura Viarengo
published
3.00
Corrine Fabie
published 3.5
2.90
Erna Nishime
published
Lise Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corrine Fabie + Rodley Fabie3255% gamesnot enough data
Ashwin Seshadri Kalathur + Sumeeta Vasishta213 matchesnot enough data
Yemia Hashimoto + Daniel Kroes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ashwin Seshadri Kalathur
20W–12L career · type D · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.36
Herve Alexanian
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Brandon Kim
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Sumeeta Vasishta
24W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Sang Gyum Kim
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.14
Emese Erdos
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Anja Brau
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
4.00
Rajasundaram Rajasekaran
24W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Daniel Kroes
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Donna Kaneko
10W–28L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
Shani Podell
27W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Sean Felder
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Wade Conklin
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
Evan Wong
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Allison Don
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Yemia Hashimoto
37W–35L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Rodley Fabie
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Anna Wielosz
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Laura Viarengo
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Corrine Fabie
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Erna Nishime
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Lise Fox
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.