Teams

MD.Winzenz

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-01vs TOC.RiderWon 20
W#1 DoublesBetsy Shoffner / Liza Sisler vs Tiffany Langino / Erika Linnander6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Williams / Charlotte Burnett vs Button Hall / Betsy Shane6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-09-13vs TOC.RiderLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Williams / Charlotte Burnett vs Zoe Dubrow / Nikki DAmbrose5-7, 4-6
2023-09-06vs TOC.HigginsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiza Sisler / Cindy Winzenz vs Alexandra Ventura / Claire Songkakul0-6, 0-6
2023-08-27vs TOC.HigginsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Winzenz / Liza Sisler vs Bren Woods / Anna Tomkins1-6, 2-6
2023-08-13vs TOC.RiderSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBetsy Shoffner / Christine Watson vs Betsy Shane / Erika Linnander6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Kelly Williams vs Erin McAllister / Kimberly Hilt4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Betsy Shoffner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Cindy Winzenz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Alena Spielberg
published 4.5
3.97
Charlotte Burnett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.54
Susan Bowser
published
3.47
Christine Reinke
published 3.5
3.09
Claire Cesta
published 3.5
Kathleen Cannon
published
Liza Sisler
published
Paige Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Winzenz + Charlotte Burnett1441% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Winzenz + Betsy Shoffner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Betsy Shoffner
98W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Cindy Winzenz
87W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alena Spielberg
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Charlotte Burnett
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
Susan Bowser
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Christine Reinke
49W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Claire Cesta
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.09
Kathleen Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Liza Sisler
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.