Teams

TOC.Higgins

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.18 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-01vs TOC.RiderWon 20
W#2 DoublesBren Woods / Elizabeth Heald vs Laura McNiven / Nikki DAmbrose4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Zerkel / Chunhui Higgins vs Leah Weinberger / Button Hall6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-17vs MD.WinzenzWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Bren Woods vs Alena Spielberg / Liza Sisler6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-10vs TOC.RiderWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Zerkel / Claire Songkakul vs Paula Collado Cordon / Betsy Shane6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlie Trinco / Lauren Bolger vs Zoe Dubrow / Erika Linnander3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBren Woods / Elizabeth Heald vs Kamila Korzeniowska / Xylena Simone Sziksai6-2, 6-4
2023-09-06vs MD.WinzenzWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Ventura / Claire Songkakul vs Liza Sisler / Cindy Winzenz6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Bren Woods vs Ira Duarte / Christine Watson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Danielle Rowe vs Paige Jennings / Kathleen Cannon6-4, 6-1
2023-08-30vs TOC.RiderWon 21
L#1 DoublesNannette Goodwin / Sarah Shelby vs Leah Weinberger / Nikki DAmbrose5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChunhui Higgins / Alexandra Ventura vs Laura McNiven / Meghan Rider7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesXimena Ordonez-Acevedo / Lorraine Bowen vs Jane Williams / Xylena Simone Sziksai6-2, 6-2
2023-08-27vs MD.WinzenzWon 10
W#3 DoublesBren Woods / Anna Tomkins vs Cindy Winzenz / Liza Sisler6-1, 6-2
2023-08-20vs TOC.RiderWon 21
W#1 DoublesXimena Ordonez-Acevedo / Lorraine Bowen vs Jane Williams / Leah Weinberger6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMeghan Zerkel / Lauren Bolger vs Meghan Rider / Betsy Shane3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Ventura / Claire Songkakul vs Kimberly Hilt / Button Hall6-1, 6-1
2023-08-06vs MD.WinzenzWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Bren Woods vs Liza Sisler / Kathy Lynch6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaire Songkakul / Charlie Trinco vs Claire Cesta / Christine Watson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Alexandra Ventura
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Meghan Zerkel
published
4.23
Charlie Trinco
published 4.5
4.21
Anna Tomkins
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.01
Lorraine Bowen
published
4.01
Claire Songkakul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.99
Chunhui Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.97
Bren Woods
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.88
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Nannette Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Sarah Shelby
published
Danielle Rowe
published 4
Lauren Bolger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Karen Borges
published
3.61
Elizabeth Heald
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Ventura + Claire Songkakul18569% games+8.3% vs expected
Chunhui Higgins + Claire Songkakul21861% games+6.8% vs expected
Chunhui Higgins + Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo9359% games+6.3% vs expected
Bren Woods + Anna Tomkins23472% games+5.3% vs expected
Bren Woods + Elizabeth Heald2537% games−5.8% vs expected
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo + Nannette Goodwin7261% gamesnot enough data
Chunhui Higgins + Nannette Goodwin5257% gamesnot enough data
Alexandra Ventura + Chunhui Higgins5164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexandra Ventura
61W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
Meghan Zerkel
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Charlie Trinco
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
Lorraine Bowen
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Claire Songkakul
107W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Chunhui Higgins
232W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.99
4.5
Bren Woods
77W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo
169W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Nannette Goodwin
313W–205L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
Sarah Shelby
57W–45L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Danielle Rowe
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Lauren Bolger
94W–77L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Borges
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Elizabeth Heald
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.