Teams

CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams

2026 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesWendy Hawley / Debra Pruitt vs Cathy Evangelist / Lisa Morgan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJandi Fraser / Dana Turban vs Marjo Hull / Thelma Sahara1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Louie / Sharon Williams vs Mary Kaump / Janet Gallagher1-6, 5-7
2026-03-16vs CV-Deep Canyon/Monk & McCannLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Hawley / Janis Hasse vs Carmen Almodovar / Kathy Brandt6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Jandi Fraser vs Kerry MacPherson / Doreen Buchy3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Louie / Sharon Williams vs Susan Sacks / Mary Kern7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-02vs CV-The Lakes/Ringer & HartLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanis Hasse / Debra Pruitt vs Lori Greenman / Lori Layne2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Dana Turban vs Kim Glasgow / Jennifer Bentley3-6, 2-6
2026-02-23vs CV-Mission Hills/Lori RomaniaLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Janis Hasse vs Sheryl Fewkes / Patricia Dudley2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Williams / Susan Vance vs Susan Devereaux / Michelle Patton7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJandi Fraser / Michele Weddle vs Michelle Churis / Sue Lambert2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDebra Pruitt / Janis Hasse vs Cathy Evangelist / Patrice Duffy6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Werner / Jandi Fraser vs Thelma Sahara / Janet Tallett4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Louie / Michele Weddle vs Sally Mangina / Lisa Morgan2-6, 1-6
2026-02-02vs CV-Deep Canyon/Monk & McCannLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanis Hasse / Wendy Hawley vs Angela Peixotto-Monk / Donna Folster1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Williams / Susan Vance vs Patrice Dicasparro / Carmen Almodovar2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Crampton / Diane Werner vs Kathy McCann / Doreen Buchy6-0, 7-5
2026-01-26vs CV-The Lakes/Ringer & HartLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Vance / Sharon Williams vs Janice Campbell / Celeste Armitage3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJandi Fraser / Janet Dunlap vs Caridad Pacheco / Karen Cunningham4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDana Turban / Michele Weddle vs Lori Greenman / Annie Schwartz2-6, 3-6
2026-01-19vs CV-Mission Hills/Lori RomaniaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Williams / Susan Vance vs Jane Whitney / Kate Slott1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Vickie Fox-Weeks vs Sheryl Fewkes / Lori Romania1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Dunlap / Judy Louie vs Susan Devereaux / Michelle Patton2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · CV Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Thelma Sahara7117717184
2CV-Deep Canyon/Monk & McCann62141024200
3CV-The Lakes/Ringer & Hart44121227221
4CV-Mission Hills/Lori Romania35131126205
5CV-Palm Desert Greens/Williams0842042269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Diane Werner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.61
Debra Pruitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Janet Dunlap
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Debbi Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Vickie Fox-Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Jandi Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Dana Turban
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Ann Crampton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Janis Hasse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Louie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Weddle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Vance
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wendy Hawley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbi Cassidy + Vickie Fox-Weeks1541% gamesnot enough data
Diane Werner + Ann Crampton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane Werner
88W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.78
4
Debra Pruitt
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Janet Dunlap
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Debbi Cassidy
36W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.39
Vickie Fox-Weeks
75W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.38
Jandi Fraser
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Dana Turban
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ann Crampton
67W–57L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Janis Hasse
1W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Judy Louie
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Vance
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Hawley
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.