Teams

5-KLaan-UNC

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-25vs 1-SEasterling-HVCCLost 02
L#2 SinglesKristi Laan vs Lindsay King6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesErin Berliner vs Melanie Biese7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-18vs 4-MLong-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Martha Clippinger0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Miho Ogura6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesErin Berliner vs Beth Dingler3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-11vs 8-MLong2-ENOSplit 11
W#2 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Sara Loeblein6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesErin Berliner vs Tess Johnson5-7, 1-6
2024-11-04vs 7-JPermutt-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKristi Laan vs Andy Blackburn1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Yvonne Acker6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-28vs 3-KMasood-ENOSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Corinne Haywood6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMarianne Gildea vs Elyssa Millard6-7, 3-6
2024-10-21vs 2-BAnderson-ENOWon 30
W#1 SinglesChristine Gladman vs Halle Amick2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristi Laan vs Suzanne Hallquist6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesErin Berliner vs Kathleen Guerra6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Amy Hoots
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Anne Cable
published 3.5
3.41
Christine Gladman
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Kristi Laan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Marianne Gildea
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Erin Berliner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Laan + Christine Gladman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Hoots
107W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%15%85%
4.13
3.5
Anne Cable
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Christine Gladman
79W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Kristi Laan
262W–182L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Marianne Gildea
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
3
Erin Berliner
57W–79L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.