Teams

11.TOC.Veerappan

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-14vs 10.TOC.SankarLost 01
L#2 DoublesBhaswanth Chava / Madhusudhanarao Nelapati vs Sandeep Verghese / Nitin Maheshwari7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-07vs 2.LOCH.RileyLost 01
L#3 DoublesRanga Narasimhan / Vijay Sivaji vs Joseph Holsopple / Mark Baldwin1-6, 2-6
2022-04-30vs 1.APEX.MiyaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSanjay Ambardar / Ranga Narasimhan vs Jeff Keisner / Allen Oliver7-6, 7-6
2022-04-23vs 4.PW.PerezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnanth Shankar / Sanjay Ambardar vs Julio Perez / Dallas Ledlow2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Hyder / Ranga Narasimhan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-31vs 8.MVL.JayashankaranWon 10
W#2 DoublesSanjay Ambardar / Madhusudhanarao Nelapati vs Srinivas Govindaraju / Olimani Deivasigamani6-3, 6-2
2022-03-17vs 7.APEX.AlexanderWon 10
W#2 DoublesSanjay Ambardar / Bhaswanth Chava vs Ryan Jobling / Dan Robinson6-2, 6-0
2022-03-06vs 5.TOC.JavalkarLost 02
L#2 DoublesRamana Sodem / Madhusudhanarao Nelapati vs Srinath Ekkad / Edward Li7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSanjay Ambardar / Ananth Shankar vs Bala Ramadoss / Jay Tu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-05vs 9.TOC.MerckLost 01
L#2 DoublesRamesh Veerappan / Ranga Narasimhan vs Matt Hankinson / Kristofer Merck6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-26vs 6.TOC.MorrowLost 02
L#2 DoublesSanjay Ambardar / Robin Hyder vs Tom Morrow / Bryan Simpson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMadhusudhanarao Nelapati / Bhaswanth Chava vs Daniel Breazeale / Lawrence Brock4-6, 0-6
2022-02-19vs 3.MVL.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesMadhusudhanarao Nelapati / Ranga Narasimhan vs Andrew Perdue / Ryan Berliner1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Uday Parikh
published
3.83
Madhusudhanarao Nelapati
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Ramana Sodem
published
3.57
Sanjay Ambardar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Ranga Narasimhan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ranga Narasimhan + Madhusudhanarao Nelapati213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Uday Parikh
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4
Madhusudhanarao Nelapati
59W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Ramana Sodem
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Sanjay Ambardar
90W–95L career · 6 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ranga Narasimhan
56W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.