Teams

OC Great Park - Nan Diesen-Ng 9:30am

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-15vs OC Yorba Linda CC - HollyLost 01
L#3 DoublesSa Cool / Cindy Lai vs Annette Tran / Ramona Chuang3-6, 1-6
2023-12-01vs OC Lifetime SC - MerwinLost 01
L#3 DoublesSa Cool / Paula Nishibayashi vs Christine Reenders / Kathleen Waite4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSunny Park / Sa Cool vs Susan Umans / Keri Long6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-11-08vs OC Great Park - JoleenLost 01
L#3 DoublesSa Cool / Christine Aguilera vs Stephanie Tarzia / Miho Mori1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLourdes Bourne / Sa Cool vs Sayuri Maruna / Regina Jacobs4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Rachel Om
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.97
Amy Huynh
published 4
3.79
Huma Khan
published
3.68
Sunny Park
published
3.62
Judy Khang
published
3.58
Paula Nishibayashi
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Linda Luk
published
3.43
Sharon Fujihara
published
3.41
Janice Ashton
published
3.37
Sa Cool
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Cindy Lai
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Huma Khan + Judy Khang6067% games+16.2% vs expected
Huma Khan + Amy Huynh6070% gamesnot enough data
Sa Cool + Paula Nishibayashi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachel Om
164W–64L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Amy Huynh
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
Huma Khan
37W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.79
Sunny Park
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Judy Khang
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Paula Nishibayashi
92W–73L career · 12 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Linda Luk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Sharon Fujihara
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Janice Ashton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Sa Cool
37W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Cindy Lai
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.