Teams

ACAC- Kelsey / Davis

2021 Richmond Tri-Level Weeknight · Weeknight Wed

17 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-10-05vs BonAir DurandWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Jean Davis vs Eleanor Gardner / Margaret Hampton Gouldin6-1, 6-2
2021-09-30vs Ridgetop PughLost 01
L#1 DoublesGrace Kim / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Ann Likhterev / Carin Krawitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-15vs Westwood CaudillLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Robin Griffith vs Denise Dietz / Kimberly Varney3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weeknight Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Grace Kim
published 4
3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Robin Griffith
published
3.34
Yasmin Lutterbie
published
Jeanette Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.15
Irene Quilez
published 3.5
3.12
Jennifer Flournoy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Funk
published
2.79
Mary Follis
published
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
published
2.66
Jackie Granger
published 3
2.37
Julia Preusser
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Granger + Mary Follis5059% games+5.8% vs expected
Pamela Blackburn + Jackie Granger224 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Kelsey + Yasmin Lutterbie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 1 line in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Robin Griffith
31W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Yasmin Lutterbie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Jeanette Kim
203W–155L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Irene Quilez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Jennifer Flournoy
111W–104L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Funk
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Mary Follis
28W–25L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Julia Preusser
12W–18L career · no lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.37
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.