Teams

Indy A18 5.0W BRE Burkhardt

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 5.0 Women, S

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-14vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WLost 01
L#1 SinglesNyah Mathis vs Krystal Grubb4-6, 0-4
2026-07-12vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Miller / Suzette Solomon vs Sarah Hopf / Kristina Tinsley7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAndrea Burkhardt vs Abbey Neff6-7, 2-6
2026-07-07vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Fugate / Andrea Burkhardt vs Krystal Grubb / Danielle Haefele2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSuzette Solomon / Zoy Brown vs Shelby Hullett / Margot Burke1-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizaveta Kleber / Rylie Wilkison vs Shelby Hullett / Sarah Coghlan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNyah Mathis vs Gabrielle Rubenstein3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Burkhardt / Suzette Solomon vs Abbey Neff / Kristina Tinsley0-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Burkhardt / Zoy Brown vs Abbey Neff / Gabrielle Rubenstein1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNyah Mathis vs Kristina Tinsley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizaveta Kleber / Catherine Miller vs Shelby Hullett / Danielle Haefele6-3, 6-0
2026-06-09vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Fugate / Rylie Wilkison vs Abbey Neff / Gabrielle Rubenstein4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNyah Mathis vs Shelby Hullett6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Burkhardt / Zoy Brown vs Sarah Coghlan / Danielle Haefele3-6, 6-7
2026-06-02vs IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Burkhardt / Catherine Miller vs Krystal Grubb / Sarah Hopf3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizaveta Kleber vs Kristina Tinsley6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · CIN Indy 18 & Over 5.0 Women, S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IN/Hullett/A18&Over5.0W7017414146
2Indy A18 5.0W BRE Burkhardt0741734208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Fugate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.54
Elizaveta Kleber
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.37
Nyah Mathis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.20
Suzette Solomon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Andrea Burkhardt
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
3.98
Zoy Brown
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christina Fugate
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizaveta Kleber
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Nyah Mathis
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.37
Suzette Solomon
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Andrea Burkhardt
77W–56L career · 14 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Zoy Brown
34W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.