Teams

SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0A

2026 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-16vs SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0CWon 30
W#1 DoublesPavan Batchu / Mona Lee vs Sam Chen / Keryun Dukellis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRizwan Niazi / Rosemary Go vs Frank Chiu / Maggie Zhou7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Johnson / Amita Mukerji vs Ken Zhang / Tianshu Begley6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesPavan Batchu / Mona Lee vs Siva Hari / Sailaja Brahmandam3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesScott Johnson / Lynn DeNamur vs Khalid Beg / Janani Vasudevan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShane Denamur / Amita Mukerji vs Oscar Ham / Karen Chen4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRosemary Go / Pavan Batchu vs Maryam Sanaei / Debashish Pal7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPavan Batchu / Dara Knoblock vs Sandra Ballestrasse / Unmesh Kulkarni6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRie Collett / Kwok Yin Chan vs June Li / Karunakar Dasineni6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBerk Algan / Rie Collett vs Heng Helen Zhang / Michael Segal6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKwok Yin Chan / Isabel Stroecker vs Siva Hari / Janani Vasudevan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Taylor / Rie Collett vs Oscar Ham / Karen Chen0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesPavan Batchu / Isabel Stroecker vs Kim Stewart / Prathap Kudupu6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRie Collett / David Taylor vs Molly Nam / Michael Segal6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSaravanan Arumugam / Amita Mukerji vs June Li / Karunakar Dasineni7-5, 6-0
2026-06-21Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSaravanan Arumugam / Julie Johnson vs Wenqiao Zhang / Jun Qian5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBerk Algan / Dara Knoblock vs Liyan DENG / Ken Zhang0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesRosemary Go / Pavan Batchu vs Ying Zhang / Andrew Morgan6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWendy McDowell / Kwok Yin Chan vs Molly Nam / Parveen Patel4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesRie Collett / Rizwan Niazi vs Sandra Miller / Randall Kunkee6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings60 teams · 40&Over MX6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX6.0A902439163
2CONCORD TC/WILLOW PASS PK 40MX6.0A9024312181
3RINCONADA PK 40MX6.0A9125511175
4GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 40MX6.0B9123717199
5BROADSTONE RC 40MX6.0A9123721204
6SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0C812349134
7CLAREMONT R and S 40MX6.0A8120715177
8FREMONT TC 40MX6.0A8122516177
9MT EDEN T and S CLUB/VETERANS MEM PK 40MX6.0A8118922197
10BAY TREES PK 40MX6.0A7221614175
11FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40MX6.0A7219819188
12SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40MX6.0A7219821212
13ALMADEN VAC 40MX6.0A72171024208
14RAFAEL RC 40MX6.0A73181228253
15MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40MX6.0A6319818170
16LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0A6318923206
17LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0B63171024208
18DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0B63171025219
19JOHNSON RANCH 40MX6.0B63161127222
20SCOTT VALLEY 40MX6.0A64151535287
21SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0A53141023200
22WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX6.0A53131124211
23FREMONT HILLS CC 40MX6.0A54161124208
24BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX6.0A54151226220
25SILVER CREEK 40MX6.0A54151227240
26CROW CANYON CC 40MX6.0A54141330245
27CHABOT CANYON 40MX6.0A54121531243
28JOHNSON RANCH 40MX6.0A55161432264
29LOS GATOS SR 40MX6.0A45141328229
30STONEBRAE CC 40MX6.0A45131430242
31SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX6.0B45131430264
32SLEEPY HOLLOW 40MX6.0A45141331249
33SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0B45121532235
34BAY TREES PK 40MX6.0B45131434252
35GOLD RIVER RC 40MX6.0A45131434259
36ROUND HILL CC 40MX6.0A45111634259
37ALMADEN SR 40MX6.0A45111635244
38GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A45111635252
39DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A45111636265
40MARIN TC 40MX6.0A46161432275
41GOLDMAN TC 40MX6.0A46121842304
42OAKLAND HILLS 40MX6.0A36101736265
43COASTSIDE TA/HALF MOON BAY HS 40MX6.0A3691837268
44EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 40MX6.0A36101739287
45DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 40MX6.0A3681941279
46GREEN VALLEY CC 40MX6.0A37121839289
47MARIN CC 40MX6.0A37111941297
48MEADOW STC 40MX6.0A2651940265
49DIAMOND HILLS 40MX6.0A27111635262
50BERKELEY TC 40MX6.0A27101736269
51CASTLEWOOD CC 40MX6.0A2791838278
52PENINSULA TC 40MX6.0A2791839275
53SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX6.0C2772042295
54DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0A2892144291
55BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40MX6.0A28102046319
56LOS GATOS SR 40MX6.0B1952552333
57CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40MX6.0A1952552333
58BLACKHAWK CC 40MX6.0A0962144297
59STANFORD-CRA 40MX6.0A0912652321
60RIO DEL ORO 40MX6.0A01042652335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Kwok Yin Chan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Mona Lee
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.08
Shane Denamur
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.05
Victoria Thorp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Saravanan Arumugam
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.00
Julie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Pavan Batchu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.95
Melanie Cazenas
published
2.88
Isabel Stroecker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Rosemary Go
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.82
Michel Schreurs
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.80
Dara Knoblock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Berk Algan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Wendy McDowell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Rizwan Niazi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Rie Collett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.46
Amita Mukerji
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lynn DeNamur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kwok Yin Chan
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Mona Lee
29W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
Shane Denamur
13W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Victoria Thorp
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Saravanan Arumugam
32W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Julie Johnson
28W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Pavan Batchu
12W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
Melanie Cazenas
10W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Isabel Stroecker
24W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Rosemary Go
24W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Michel Schreurs
15W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Dara Knoblock
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Berk Algan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy McDowell
24W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.72
Rizwan Niazi
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Rie Collett
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Amita Mukerji
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
Lynn DeNamur
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.