SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0C

2026 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule5 played

2026-08-16vs SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0ALost 0–1

L#2 DoublesFrank Chiu / Maggie Zhou vs Rizwan Niazi / Rosemary Go6-7, 4-6

2026-08-09vs CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40MX6.0ALost 0–1

L#2 DoublesFrank Chiu / Tianshu Begley vs Mary Beth Huey / Michael Segal6-3, 2-6, 0-1

2026-07-26vs CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40MX6.0AWon 1–0

W#3 DoublesFrank Chiu / Tianshu Begley vs Mark Hadley / Sandra Miller6-4, 6-3

2026-07-01vs CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40MX6.0AWon 1–0

W#3 DoublesJun Qian / Maggie Zhou vs Heng Helen Zhang / Tak Young6-0, 6-1

2026-06-09vs SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0BLost 0–1

L#1 DoublesMaggie Zhou / Johnny Zhang vs Siva Hari / Renata Cunha2-6, 3-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings60 teams · 40&Over MX6.0

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX6.0A	9	0	24	3	9	163
2CONCORD TC/WILLOW PASS PK 40MX6.0A	9	0	24	3	12	181
3RINCONADA PK 40MX6.0A	9	1	25	5	11	175
4GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 40MX6.0B	9	1	23	7	17	199
5BROADSTONE RC 40MX6.0A	9	1	23	7	21	204
6SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0C	8	1	23	4	9	134
7CLAREMONT R and S 40MX6.0A	8	1	20	7	15	177
8FREMONT TC 40MX6.0A	8	1	22	5	16	177
9MT EDEN T and S CLUB/VETERANS MEM PK 40MX6.0A	8	1	18	9	22	197
10BAY TREES PK 40MX6.0A	7	2	21	6	14	175
11FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 40MX6.0A	7	2	19	8	19	188
12SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK 40MX6.0A	7	2	19	8	21	212
13ALMADEN VAC 40MX6.0A	7	2	17	10	24	208
14RAFAEL RC 40MX6.0A	7	3	18	12	28	253
15MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 40MX6.0A	6	3	19	8	18	170
16LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0A	6	3	18	9	23	206
17LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS 40MX6.0B	6	3	17	10	24	208
18DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0B	6	3	17	10	25	219
19JOHNSON RANCH 40MX6.0B	6	3	16	11	27	222
20SCOTT VALLEY 40MX6.0A	6	4	15	15	35	287
21SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0A	5	3	14	10	23	200
22WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX6.0A	5	3	13	11	24	211
23FREMONT HILLS CC 40MX6.0A	5	4	16	11	24	208
24BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX6.0A	5	4	15	12	26	220
25SILVER CREEK 40MX6.0A	5	4	15	12	27	240
26CROW CANYON CC 40MX6.0A	5	4	14	13	30	245
27CHABOT CANYON 40MX6.0A	5	4	12	15	31	243
28JOHNSON RANCH 40MX6.0A	5	5	16	14	32	264
29LOS GATOS SR 40MX6.0A	4	5	14	13	28	229
30STONEBRAE CC 40MX6.0A	4	5	13	14	30	242
31SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX6.0B	4	5	13	14	30	264
32SLEEPY HOLLOW 40MX6.0A	4	5	14	13	31	249
33SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX6.0B	4	5	12	15	32	235
34BAY TREES PK 40MX6.0B	4	5	13	14	34	252
35GOLD RIVER RC 40MX6.0A	4	5	13	14	34	259
36ROUND HILL CC 40MX6.0A	4	5	11	16	34	259
37ALMADEN SR 40MX6.0A	4	5	11	16	35	244
38GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A	4	5	11	16	35	252
39DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A	4	5	11	16	36	265
40MARIN TC 40MX6.0A	4	6	16	14	32	275
41GOLDMAN TC 40MX6.0A	4	6	12	18	42	304
42OAKLAND HILLS 40MX6.0A	3	6	10	17	36	265
43COASTSIDE TA/HALF MOON BAY HS 40MX6.0A	3	6	9	18	37	268
44EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK 40MX6.0A	3	6	10	17	39	287
45DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 40MX6.0A	3	6	8	19	41	279
46GREEN VALLEY CC 40MX6.0A	3	7	12	18	39	289
47MARIN CC 40MX6.0A	3	7	11	19	41	297
48MEADOW STC 40MX6.0A	2	6	5	19	40	265
49DIAMOND HILLS 40MX6.0A	2	7	11	16	35	262
50BERKELEY TC 40MX6.0A	2	7	10	17	36	269
51CASTLEWOOD CC 40MX6.0A	2	7	9	18	38	278
52PENINSULA TC 40MX6.0A	2	7	9	18	39	275
53SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX6.0C	2	7	7	20	42	295
54DAVIE STADIUM 40MX6.0A	2	8	9	21	44	291
55BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40MX6.0A	2	8	10	20	46	319
56LOS GATOS SR 40MX6.0B	1	9	5	25	52	333
57CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 40MX6.0A	1	9	5	25	52	333
58BLACKHAWK CC 40MX6.0A	0	9	6	21	44	297
59STANFORD-CRA 40MX6.0A	0	9	1	26	52	321
60RIO DEL ORO 40MX6.0A	0	10	4	26	52	335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51

Jun Qian

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

3.25

Frank Chiu

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.19

Alan Ren

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

3.17

Keryun Dukellis

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —

3.15

Xuan Wei

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published —

3.15

Xia Li

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

3.14

Roger Liu

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published —

3.14

Liyan DENG

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

3.04

Mei Zhou

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published —

3.03

Chen Wang

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3

3.02

YANG LUO

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —

2.99

Ken Zhang

usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published —

2.79

Chanchan Du

usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3

2.76

Tianshu Begley

usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published —

2.72

Wenqiao Zhang

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published —

2.70

Maggie Zhou

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chen Wang + Chanchan Du	3–0	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Jun Qian

21W–2L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%46%54%

3.51

3.5

Frank Chiu

1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026

3%95%2%

3.25

Alan Ren

35W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%8%92%

3.19

—

Keryun Dukellis

25W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026

0%<1%>99%

3.17

—

Xuan Wei

34W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%12%88%

3.15

—

Xia Li

8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026

0%<1%>99%

3.15

—

Roger Liu

30W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%14%86%

3.14

—

Liyan DENG

28W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%14%86%

3.14

—

Mei Zhou

14W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%36%64%

3.04

Chen Wang

30W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%42%58%

3.03

—

YANG LUO

27W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%44%56%

3.02

—

Ken Zhang

11W–2L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%53%47%

2.99

Chanchan Du

30W–11L career · 13 lines in 2026

1%93%5%

2.79

—

Tianshu Begley

7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026

2%95%3%

2.76

—

Wenqiao Zhang

19W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026

0%5%95%

2.72

—

Maggie Zhou

5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026

0%6%94%

2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.