Teams

Spalding/Hazlewood/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.0 Women - WED AM

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-19vs Yung-Okamoto/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenna Hazlewood / Mary Grace Gaines vs Jeanai Kluge / Allison Wright3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Davis / Sandra Elliott vs Kathleen Doulin / Abigail Kirkman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Jacobs / Sophia Skelton vs Beth Lawrence / Glenda Jordan1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Crystal Wray
published 4
3.53
Noelle Cotey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Tydres Mestiri
published
3.46
Mary Grace Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Sandra Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Erica Waterbury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Suzanne Spalding
published
3.18
Cathy Radig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Christina Beattie
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jenna Hazlewood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sophia Skelton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crystal Wray + Tydres Mestiri3545% games−0.2% vs expected
Sandra Elliott + Mary Grace Gaines033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystal Wray
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Noelle Cotey
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Tydres Mestiri
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mary Grace Gaines
1W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Sandra Elliott
5W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Erica Waterbury
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Suzanne Spalding
36W–38L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Cathy Radig
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christina Beattie
14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jenna Hazlewood
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sophia Skelton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.