Teams

Yung-Okamoto/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 4.0 Women - WED AM

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-23vs Ternes/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeanai Kluge / Paula Mcgowan vs Tinsley Hastings / Kimberly Wilson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAbigail Kirkman vs Elle Ternes6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Feyes / Donna Leedle vs Brittany Drescher / Ashley Kennedy6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSarah Torrence vs Kerry Lynn Regan6-0, 6-2
2024-11-02vs Glickman/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesSarah Torrence / Kaly Bush vs Diana Buss / Heidi Nickel6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCourtney Hess vs Alma Islas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Feyes / Julie Segura vs Chris Leonard / Regan Baltasar6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAbigail Kirkman vs Erin Akery6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Doulin / Glenda Jordan vs Margaux Armfield / Mariam Haider6-2, 6-2
2024-10-19vs Spalding/Hazlewood/NashvilleWon 40
W#1 DoublesJeanai Kluge / Allison Wright vs Jenna Hazlewood / Mary Grace Gaines6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTammy Jirjis vs Karen Martin6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Doulin / Abigail Kirkman vs Jessica Davis / Sandra Elliott6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Lawrence / Glenda Jordan vs Vicki Jacobs / Sophia Skelton6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Stephanie Feyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Jeanai Kluge
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.98
Sarah Torrence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.93
Paula Mcgowan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Abigail Kirkman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.91
Glenda Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Courtney Hess
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.82
Tammy Jirjis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Heather Laney
published
3.81
Kaly Bush
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Trina Gilbert
published
3.75
Katie Feyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Beth Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Tanya Capeling
published
3.70
Kathleen Doulin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Donna Leedle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Julie Segura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Pat Yung-Okamoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Feyes + Stephanie Feyes7067% games+13.1% vs expected
Heather Laney + Kathleen Doulin6358% games−5.3% vs expected
Beth Lawrence + Trina Gilbert5552% games−10.5% vs expected
Jeanai Kluge + Katie Feyes123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Feyes + Kaly Bush033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Feyes
34W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Jeanai Kluge
17W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Sarah Torrence
23W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Paula Mcgowan
11W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Abigail Kirkman
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Glenda Jordan
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Courtney Hess
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
Tammy Jirjis
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Heather Laney
22W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kaly Bush
28W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Trina Gilbert
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Katie Feyes
24W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Beth Lawrence
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Tanya Capeling
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kathleen Doulin
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Donna Leedle
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Julie Segura
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Pat Yung-Okamoto
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.