Teams

NJ GREEN

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 3.46 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-05vs MC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesGary Civitella / Pamela Johnstone vs Jolein Harro / Paul Sylvester6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Steffer / Jennifer Stiebeling vs Patricia Demers / Christian Hogrefe2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Huynh / Natasha Uecker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-28vs NJ NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndy MacQueen / Zhenzhen Yu vs Greg Aigner / Julie Gall6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Huynh / Natasha Uecker vs Peggy Hofstra / Sasha Shepard6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGarrett Sailer / Sara Leaver vs Barbara Everard / Michael Everard6-0, 6-3
2026-06-21vs BP BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Eng / Carper Davis vs Judith Law / John Nelson6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Leaver / Garrett Sailer vs Susan Gallo / Harvey Wherry6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / John Steffer vs Maurice Murray / Katie Todd6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs MC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatasha Uecker / Mark Kiker vs Chris Driscoll / Kristin Mazzarese6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGarrett Sailer / Sara Leaver vs Erik Hunsinger / Vicki Emch6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndy MacQueen / Zhenzhen Yu vs Patricia Billinger / Sterling Field6-2, 6-1
2026-06-07vs LTC-M GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Kiker / Rachel Eng vs Zachary Knaus / Christina Santino6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAndy MacQueen / Zhenzhen Yu vs Tina Atchley / Jean Francois6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarper Davis / Pamela Johnstone vs Meegan Miloud / Gregory Richardson6-1, 6-2
2026-05-24vs RHCC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesGarrett Sailer / Sara Leaver vs Matthew Charles / Emily Weiland6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Huynh / Natasha Uecker vs Steve Fisher / Marilyn Fisher6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGary Civitella / Pamela Johnstone vs Jon McVey / Brook Cowin6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Garrett Sailer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Andy MacQueen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.70
Jennifer Stiebeling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Michael Huynh
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Pamela Johnstone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Gary Civitella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Natasha Uecker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Carper Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Rachel Eng
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Michael Schirmacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
John Steffer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Sara Leaver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Mark Kiker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
2.92
Zhenzhen Yu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natasha Uecker + Michael Huynh9266% games+14.4% vs expected
Carper Davis + Rachel Eng4264% games+4.3% vs expected
Zhenzhen Yu + Andy MacQueen7261% games+3.0% vs expected
Carper Davis + Jennifer Stiebeling9065% games−6.9% vs expected
Garrett Sailer + Sara Leaver4355% games−11.0% vs expected
Jennifer Stiebeling + Michael Schirmacher5261% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Stiebeling + Garrett Sailer6070% gamesnot enough data
Gary Civitella + Pamela Johnstone404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Garrett Sailer
66W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Andy MacQueen
56W–42L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Jennifer Stiebeling
175W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Michael Huynh
44W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Pamela Johnstone
171W–63L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Gary Civitella
39W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Natasha Uecker
87W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Carper Davis
46W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Rachel Eng
194W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Michael Schirmacher
52W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
John Steffer
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Sara Leaver
110W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
0
Mark Kiker
35W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Zhenzhen Yu
37W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.