Teams

BP BLUE

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-05vs MC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaurice Murray / Melissa Richmond vs Nick Hantge / Kristen Lowe6-7, 1-5
W#2 DoublesJudith Law / John Nelson vs Vicki Emch / Sterling Field6-2, 3-0
W#3 DoublesHarvey Wherry / Susan Gallo vs Patricia Billinger / Chris Billinger6-1, 6-3
2026-06-28vs LTC-M GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Ortiz / Judith Law vs Emily Adams / Zachary Knaus3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Gallo / Harvey Wherry vs Clarissa Manzi / Daniel Port2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKatie Todd / Antonio Vigil vs Stephen Schulte / Kelly Wilson4-6, 2-6
2026-06-21vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesJudith Law / John Nelson vs Rachel Eng / Carper Davis1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Gallo / Harvey Wherry vs Sara Leaver / Garrett Sailer2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMaurice Murray / Katie Todd vs Jennifer Stiebeling / John Steffer7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-14vs RHCC ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesAntonio Vigil / Katie Todd vs Ron Jones / Brook Cowin3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Lane / Melissa Richmond vs Steve Fisher / Marilyn Fisher6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Gallo / Jason Ortiz vs Gerald Suman / Kimberly Salazar Suman5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-07vs MC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Gallo / Jason Ortiz vs Jolein Harro / Bryan Noto6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudith Law / Maurice Murray vs Patricia Demers / Scott Newcomb6-4, 7-5
2026-05-31vs NJ NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Richmond / David Lane vs Ursula Hamel / John Astle4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJudith Law / John Nelson vs Peggy Hofstra / Gary Bland6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Gallo / Harvey Wherry vs Barbara Everard / Michael Everard6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings47 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RRTC ORANGE70201371
2KNO GREEN702017126
3Colorado/Suresh/MX40&Over7.07016514158
4RCC GREEN6118312152
5CP RED6117413155
6GAC GREEN6116515131
7CPV GREEN6114718176
8CVTA RED5113513133
9LTFC GREEN5215616135
10CACM ORANGE5215618180
11CP PURPLE5214719170
12CK-M RED5213819164
13LTA-Q GREEN5212921192
14BRMST PURPLE4210822182
15KC-CC GREEN4315615159
16BTA-C RED4312919141
17GTC YELLOW4313819169
18PRC GREEN43111021170
19KC-CC PURPLE4312923181
20PRC NAVY4312924199
21WP ORANGE43111024184
22PH BLUE4312925197
23LEBTC TEAL43101126191
24DTC BLUE4391228217
25LTC-M GREEN3311716146
26BP BLUE339920161
27MEA RED339921169
28NJ BLUE34111020188
29RRTC YELLOW3491226182
30CM YELLOW3481328191
31LEBTC NAVY3481329205
32LTFC PURPLE3471430226
33RHCC ORANGE237817125
34BCC GREEN2471125185
35NJ PINK2471125179
36SS-LGT PURPLE2591224180
37WP RED2561530212
38CACM GREEN2551633219
39KC-CC ORANGE2561533225
40BRMST GREEN2551636239
41CVTA GREEN1651633222
42CACM NAVY1651634229
43CK-M GREEN1651635225
44MC BLUE0531225163
45CVTA BLUE0651329197
46PRC RED0741736233
47SS-H PURPLE0731838240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Antonio Vigil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Jason Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Melissa Richmond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
David Lane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Maurice Murray
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Harvey Wherry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Natalie Brader
published
3.03
Susan Gallo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Judith Law
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Katie Todd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harvey Wherry + Susan Gallo21139% games−3.3% vs expected
Judith Law + David Lane4351% gamesnot enough data
Judith Law + Antonio Vigil134 matchesnot enough data
Judith Law + Maurice Murray224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Gallo + Jason Ortiz303 matchesnot enough data
David Lane + Melissa Richmond123 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Richmond + Jason Ortiz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antonio Vigil
7W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Jason Ortiz
18W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Melissa Richmond
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
David Lane
24W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Maurice Murray
25W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Harvey Wherry
32W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Natalie Brader
7W–18L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Susan Gallo
13W–46L career · 6 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Judith Law
16W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Katie Todd
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.